Resch K L, Hill S, Ernst E
Dept of Complementary Medicine, Postgraduate Medical School, Exeter, UK.
Clin Rheumatol. 1997 Jun;16(4):391-5. doi: 10.1007/BF02242457.
The popularity of complementary medicine is at an all-time high. Rheumatological patients are amongst its most frequent users. This survey was aimed at generating insight into this phenomenon. A self-selected convenience sample of 3384 individuals with 'arthritis' was sent a purpose-designed questionnaire. 1020 completed questionnaires were received (response rate = 30.1%). One third of respondents had received at least one treatment from a complementary practitioner. Orthodox therapies were generally perceived as more effective than complementary treatments. Therapeutic encounters with complementary practitioners were viewed as markedly more satisfying than those with GPs. Adverse effects reported in connection with orthodox treatments were more frequent and severe than those reported with complementary therapies. No firm conclusions can be drawn from these data. However, a hypothesis emerges that complementary medicine is well accepted by rheumatological patients and perceived to have certain advantages over mainstream medicine.
辅助医学的受欢迎程度空前高涨。风湿病患者是其最频繁的使用者之一。这项调查旨在深入了解这一现象。向3384名自认为患有“关节炎”的个体发送了一份专门设计的问卷,这些个体是自我选择的便利样本。共收到1020份完整问卷(回复率 = 30.1%)。三分之一的受访者至少接受过一位辅助治疗从业者的治疗。传统疗法通常被认为比辅助治疗更有效。与辅助治疗从业者的治疗接触被认为比与全科医生的治疗接触更令人满意。与传统治疗相关的不良反应报告比与辅助治疗相关的更频繁、更严重。从这些数据中无法得出确凿结论。然而,一个假设出现了,即辅助医学很受风湿病患者欢迎,并且被认为比主流医学有某些优势。