Keenan S P, Busche K D, Chen L M, McCarthy L, Inman K J, Sibbald W J
Richard Ivey Critical Care Trauma Center, Victoria Hospital, London, ON, Canada.
Crit Care Med. 1997 Aug;25(8):1324-31. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199708000-00019.
To determine the proportion of patients who died as a result of the withdrawal or withholding of life support (WD/WHLS) in the intensive care units (ICUs) of three teaching hospitals and to describe the process involved by determining: a) why the decision was made to withdraw support (WDLS); b) when WDLS took place; and c) how the WDLS process was conducted.
Retrospective cohort study.
Three university-affiliated ICUs.
Four hundred nineteen patients who died in one of three academic, tertiary care ICUs over a 1-yr period.
Retrospective chart review. Data collected included age, gender, admitting diagnoses, comorbid disease, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, and mode of death (brain death, death due to withholding of life support, death due to WDLS, or death despite ongoing therapy). For those patients dying due to WDLS, the reason for WDLS, person initiating discussion, timing of WDLS, degree of organ dysfunction, order of withdrawal of life support modalities, and the use of sedatives and analgesics were recorded.
Seventy percent of patients died by WD/WHLS and 8.4% were brain dead. Patients undergoing WD/WHLS were older and had a longer length of stay than patients dying from other causes. Poor prognosis was the most common reason given for WDLS, reflected by significant organ dysfunction at the time of WDLS. Future quality of life was a less frequently cited reason. Most patients undergoing WDLS did so early in their ICU stay, although time to WDLS appeared to reflect diagnostic group. Few meetings occurred before WDLS and death occurred soon after initiating WDLS. There was a preference of withdrawing mechanical ventilation last and large amounts of morphine (mean 21 +/- 33 [SD] mg/hr) and benzodiazepines (mean 8.6 +/- 11 mg/hr) were used. Little variability in practice was apparent among the studied ICUs.
Similar to other studies, WD/WHLS was the most common cause of death in academic ICUs and poor patient prognosis was considered the most important factor in deciding on WDLS. However, in contrast to other studies, future quality of life was not as frequently cited a reason for WDLS and larger amounts of morphine were used during WDLS. These discrepancies suggest areas for potential future research.
确定在三家教学医院重症监护病房(ICU)中因撤除或 withhold 生命支持(WD/WHLS)而死亡的患者比例,并通过确定以下方面来描述所涉及的过程:a)为何做出撤除支持的决定(WDLS);b)WDLS 何时发生;c)WDLS 过程是如何进行的。
回顾性队列研究。
三家大学附属医院的 ICU。
在一年期间于三家学术性三级护理 ICU 之一死亡的 419 名患者。
回顾性病历审查。收集的数据包括年龄、性别、入院诊断、合并症、急性生理与慢性健康状况评价 II 评分以及死亡方式(脑死亡、因 withhold 生命支持死亡、因 WDLS 死亡或尽管进行了持续治疗仍死亡)。对于因 WDLS 死亡的患者,记录 WDLS 的原因、发起讨论的人、WDLS 的时间、器官功能障碍程度、生命支持方式撤除顺序以及镇静剂和镇痛药的使用情况。
70%的患者因 WD/WHLS 死亡,8.4%为脑死亡。接受 WD/WHLS 的患者比因其他原因死亡的患者年龄更大且住院时间更长。预后不良是 WDLS 最常见的原因,这在 WDLS 时显著的器官功能障碍中得到体现。未来生活质量是较少被提及的原因。大多数接受 WDLS 的患者在其 ICU 住院早期就进行了 WDLS,尽管 WDLS 的时间似乎反映了诊断组。WDLS 之前很少有会议,且在启动 WDLS 后不久患者就死亡了。最后撤除机械通气存在偏好,并且使用了大量吗啡(平均 21±33[标准差]mg/小时)和苯二氮䓬类药物(平均 8.6±11mg/小时)。在所研究的 ICU 之间,实践中的差异很小。
与其他研究相似,WD/WHLS 是学术性 ICU 中最常见的死亡原因,患者预后不良被认为是决定 WDLS 的最重要因素。然而,与其他研究不同的是,未来生活质量并非 WDLS 的常见原因,并且在 WDLS 期间使用了更多的吗啡。这些差异表明了未来潜在的研究领域。