• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同专业水平对分类基本层次的影响。

Effects of varying levels of expertise on the basic level of categorization.

作者信息

Johnson K E, Mervis C B

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Indiana University-Purdue University at Indianapolis 46202-3275, USA.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Gen. 1997 Sep;126(3):248-77. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.126.3.248.

DOI:10.1037//0096-3445.126.3.248
PMID:9281832
Abstract

Six experiments were conducted on the effects of expertise on basic-level categorization. Individuals with varying levels of knowledge about songbirds generated lists of attributes, named objects, identified and discriminated among object silhouettes, verified category membership at 4 hierarchical levels, and visually identified songbirds primed either by species-specific, related, or unrelated birdsong. Results indicated that the original basic level never lost its privileged status. Expertise increased access to categorical information at the subordinate level for intermediate exports and at both the subordinate and sub-subordinate levels for advanced experts, causing these sublevels to function as basic. Throughout the continuum of expertise, conceptual knowledge interacted with perception. Accordingly, experts attended to different and more subtle perceptual features than novices.

摘要

针对专业知识对基础水平分类的影响进行了六项实验。对鸣禽有着不同知识水平的个体生成了属性列表、为物体命名、识别并区分物体轮廓、在四个层次水平上验证类别归属,以及通过特定物种、相关或不相关的鸟鸣声进行视觉识别鸣禽。结果表明,最初的基础水平从未失去其特权地位。专业知识增加了中级专家对下属水平类别信息的获取,以及高级专家对下属和次下属水平类别信息的获取,使这些子水平发挥基础水平的作用。在整个专业知识连续体中,概念知识与感知相互作用。因此,专家比新手关注不同且更细微的感知特征。

相似文献

1
Effects of varying levels of expertise on the basic level of categorization.不同专业水平对分类基本层次的影响。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 1997 Sep;126(3):248-77. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.126.3.248.
2
Are all types of expertise created equal? Car experts use different spatial frequency scales for subordinate categorization of cars and faces.所有类型的专业知识都是平等的吗?汽车专家在对汽车和人脸进行下属分类时使用不同的空间频率尺度。
PLoS One. 2013 Jun 24;8(6):e67024. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067024. Print 2013.
3
Hierarchical attention in discriminating objects at different levels of specificity.在区分不同特异性水平的物体时的分层注意力。
Percept Psychophys. 2006 Jul;68(5):845-60. doi: 10.3758/bf03193706.
4
Impact of varying levels of expertise on decisions of category typicality.不同专业水平对类别典型性决策的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2001 Oct;29(7):1036-50. doi: 10.3758/bf03195765.
5
Objects, parts, and categories.对象、部分和类别。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 1984 Jun;113(2):169-97.
6
Time course of visual object categorization: fastest does not necessarily mean first.视觉物体分类的时间进程:最快并不一定意味着最先。
Vision Res. 2009 Jul;49(15):1961-8. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.05.005. Epub 2009 May 19.
7
Impact of intuitive theories on feature recruitment throughout the continuum of expertise.直观理论对专业技能连续体中特征招募的影响。
Mem Cognit. 1998 Mar;26(2):382-401. doi: 10.3758/bf03201148.
8
Basic-level categorization of intermediate complexity fragments reveals top-down effects of expertise in visual perception.中等复杂度片段的基本层次分类揭示了视觉感知中专业知识的自上而下效应。
J Vis. 2011 Jul 28;11(8):18. doi: 10.1167/11.8.18.
9
Subordinate-level object classification reexamined.重新审视下属层级的对象分类。
Psychol Res. 1999;62(2-3):131-53. doi: 10.1007/s004260050047.
10
From bird to sparrow: Learning-induced modulations in fine-grained semantic discrimination.从鸟到麻雀:学习诱导的精细语义辨别调节。
Neuroimage. 2015 Sep;118:163-73. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.05.091. Epub 2015 Jun 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Word learning as category formation.作为范畴形成的词汇学习。
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 3;20(7):e0327615. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327615. eCollection 2025.
2
A Linguistic-Sensorimotor Model of the Basic-Level Advantage in Category Verification.类别验证中基本层次优势的语言-感觉运动模型。
Cogn Sci. 2024 Dec;48(12):e70025. doi: 10.1111/cogs.70025.
3
A perceptual field test in object experts using gaze-contingent eye tracking.使用注视相关眼动追踪的物体专家的知觉领域测试。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 15;13(1):11437. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-37695-9.
4
What Is Behind the Buzzword for Experts and Laymen: Representation of "Artificial Intelligence" in the IT-Professionals' and Non-Professionals' Minds.专家和外行口中热词的背后:“人工智能”在信息技术专业人士与非专业人士心中的呈现
Eur J Psychol. 2022 May 31;18(2):207-218. doi: 10.5964/ejop.5473. eCollection 2022 May.
5
LAG-1: A dynamic, integrative model of learning, attention, and gaze.LAG-1:一种动态的、综合的学习、注意力和注视模型。
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 17;17(3):e0259511. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259511. eCollection 2022.
6
The characterization of actions at the superordinate, basic and subordinate level.动作在超总、基本和从属水平上的特征化。
Psychol Res. 2022 Sep;86(6):1871-1891. doi: 10.1007/s00426-021-01624-0. Epub 2021 Dec 14.
7
The effect of spatial distance between objects on categorization level.物体之间空间距离对分类水平的影响。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2022 Feb;29(1):230-242. doi: 10.3758/s13423-021-01949-2. Epub 2021 Aug 2.
8
Of Pandemics and Zombies: The Influence of Prior Concepts on COVID-19 Pandemic-Related Behaviors.论大流行与僵尸:先前概念对 COVID-19 大流行相关行为的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 14;18(10):5207. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18105207.
9
Talker-specific predictions during language processing.语言处理过程中特定说话者的预测。
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2020;35(6):797-812. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2019.1630654. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
10
The India Face Set: International and Cultural Boundaries Impact Face Impressions and Perceptions of Category Membership.印度面孔集:国际和文化边界影响对面孔的印象及类别归属认知。
Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 11;12:627678. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.627678. eCollection 2021.