van Balkom A J, Bakker A, Spinhoven P, Blaauw B M, Smeenk S, Ruesink B
Department of Psychiatry, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1997 Aug;185(8):510-6. doi: 10.1097/00005053-199708000-00006.
To compare short-term efficacy of benzodiazepines, antidepressants, psychological panic management, exposure in vivo, and combination treatments in panic disorder with or without agoraphobia (PA), a meta-analysis was conducted. Included were 106 studies, pertaining to 222 treatment conditions, 5,011 patients at pretest and 4,016 at posttest. Pre/post effect sizes Cohen's d were calculated within the treatment conditions for four clinical variables: panic, agoraphobia, depression, and general anxiety. Seven large treatment conditions were used in the main analyses: high-potency benzodiazepines, antidepressants, psychological panic management, exposure in vivo, pill-placebo combined with exposure, antidepressants combined with exposure, and psychological panic management combined with exposure in vivo. First, these treatments were compared with a control condition, consisting of pill-placebo, attention placebo, and waiting list. Next, a comparison was made between the treatments. Antidepressants, psychological panic management, high-potency benzodiazepines, and antidepressants combined with exposure in vivo were superior to the control condition for panic attacks. Exposure in vivo alone was not effective for panic attacks. With regard to agoraphobic avoidance, all seven treatments were superior to the control condition. When comparing the various treatment conditions, no differences concerning panic attacks were found. For agoraphobic avoidance, the combination of antidepressants with exposure in vivo was superior to the other conditions. The combination of antidepressants with exposure in vivo is the most potent short-term treatment of PA.
为比较苯二氮䓬类药物、抗抑郁药、心理恐慌管理、现场暴露及联合治疗在伴或不伴广场恐惧症(PA)的恐慌症中的短期疗效,进行了一项荟萃分析。纳入了106项研究,涉及222种治疗条件,5011例患者在测试前参与,4016例在测试后参与。在治疗条件下针对四个临床变量计算前后效应量Cohen's d:恐慌、广场恐惧症、抑郁和一般焦虑。主要分析中使用了七种大型治疗条件:高效能苯二氮䓬类药物、抗抑郁药、心理恐慌管理、现场暴露、安慰剂联合暴露、抗抑郁药联合暴露以及心理恐慌管理联合现场暴露。首先,将这些治疗与由丸剂安慰剂、注意力安慰剂和等候名单组成的对照条件进行比较。接下来,对各治疗进行比较。抗抑郁药、心理恐慌管理、高效能苯二氮䓬类药物以及抗抑郁药联合现场暴露在恐慌发作方面优于对照条件。单独的现场暴露对恐慌发作无效。关于广场恐惧症回避,所有七种治疗均优于对照条件。在比较各种治疗条件时,未发现恐慌发作方面的差异。对于广场恐惧症回避,抗抑郁药与现场暴露的联合优于其他条件。抗抑郁药与现场暴露的联合是PA最有效的短期治疗方法。