• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Measurements of respiratory system resistance by the interrupter technique in healthy and asthmatic children.

作者信息

Oswald-Mammosser M, Llerena C, Speich J P, Donata L

机构信息

Service des Explorations Fonctionnelles Respiratoires et de Exercice, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Hôpital Civil, France.

出版信息

Pediatr Pulmonol. 1997 Aug;24(2):78-85. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-0496(199708)24:2<78::aid-ppul2>3.0.co;2-e.

DOI:10.1002/(sici)1099-0496(199708)24:2<78::aid-ppul2>3.0.co;2-e
PMID:9292898
Abstract

We studied respiratory system resistance by the interrupter technique (Rint) in healthy and asthmatic children, paying special attention to the effect of cheek compliance and the effects of supporting the cheeks, the influence of lung volume at which interruption was performed, the effect of direction of flow before occlusion (inspiration vs. expiration), and short-term reproducibility of this method. One hundred and thirty-two children (36 controls and 96 asthmatics) were included in the study (mean, 9.0 +/- SD 3.6 years). Rint was calculated from the ratio of the alveolar pressure (estimated from moth pressure during occlusion) to the flow prior to interruption. We observed that 1) underestimation of airway resistance due to upper airway compliance can be minimized by supporting the cheeks; Rint was significantly lower when measured without supporting the cheeks than with support of the cheeks in controls (3.9 +/- 0.9 vs. 4.7 +/- 1.2 cmH2O.L-1.s, respectively) and asthmatics (5.2 +/- 1.6 vs 6.9 +/- 2.0 cmH2O.L-1.s); the quantitative differences of Rint with and without cheek support was larger in small children and in the most obstructed children; 2) performing occlusion at mid-tidal volume accurately reflected the respiratory system resistance of the whole respiratory cycle since we observed no difference in Rint when performing occlusion at different volumes during quiet respiration or at the middle of tidal volume; 3) Rint measured during expiration was higher than Rint obtained during inspiration in controls and in asthmatics; moreover, the effect of direction of flow before occlusion was greater in the small children; 4) Rint was closely correlated to height in controls (r = -0.82; P < 0.001); and 5) short-term reproducibility (at 15 min intervals) was satisfactory in controls and asthmatics (coefficients of variation were 9% and 7%, respectively).

摘要

相似文献

1
Measurements of respiratory system resistance by the interrupter technique in healthy and asthmatic children.
Pediatr Pulmonol. 1997 Aug;24(2):78-85. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-0496(199708)24:2<78::aid-ppul2>3.0.co;2-e.
2
Effects of respiratory timing and cheek support on resistance measurements, before and after bronchodilation in asthmatic children using the interrupter technique.使用阻断器技术,在哮喘儿童支气管扩张前后,呼吸时间和脸颊支撑对阻力测量的影响。
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2003 Dec;36(6):495-501. doi: 10.1002/ppul.10384.
3
Evaluation of the interrupter technique for the use of assessing airway obstruction in children.用于评估儿童气道阻塞的阻断器技术的评估。
Pediatr Pulmonol. 1994 Apr;17(4):211-7. doi: 10.1002/ppul.1950170402.
4
Interrupter technique versus plethysmography for measurement of respiratory resistance in children with asthma or cystic fibrosis.用于测量哮喘或囊性纤维化患儿呼吸阻力的阻断器技术与体积描记法对比研究
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2000 Mar;29(3):213-20. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-0496(200003)29:3<213::aid-ppul10>3.0.co;2-n.
5
Reference values of interrupter respiratory resistance in healthy preschool white children.健康学龄前白人儿童中呼吸阻力中断器的参考值。
Thorax. 2001 Sep;56(9):691-5. doi: 10.1136/thorax.56.9.691.
6
Comparison of resistance measured by the interrupter technique and by passive mechanics in sedated infants.
Eur Respir J. 2001 Aug;18(2):330-4. doi: 10.1183/09031936.01.00018401.
7
Evaluation of a new interrupter device for measuring bronchial responsiveness and the response to bronchodilator in 3 year old children.评估一种用于测量3岁儿童支气管反应性及对支气管扩张剂反应的新型阻断装置。
Eur Respir J. 1996 Jul;9(7):1374-80. doi: 10.1183/09031936.96.09071374.
8
Opening interrupter technique in pre-school children with chronic respiratory diseases: a perspective case-control study in the diagnosis of airway hyperesponsiveness.慢性呼吸道疾病学龄前儿童的开放中断技术:气道高反应性诊断的前瞻性病例对照研究
J Asthma. 2013 Dec;50(10):1045-8. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2013.834507. Epub 2013 Sep 18.
9
The opening interrupter technique for respiratory resistance measurements in children.儿童呼吸阻力测量的开口中断技术。
Respirology. 2010 Oct;15(7):1104-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2010.01828.x.
10
Assessment of airway function in young children with asthma: comparison of spirometry, interrupter technique, and tidal flow by inductance plethsmography.哮喘幼儿气道功能评估:肺量计、阻断法及感应体积描记法潮气量测定的比较
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2004 Jun;37(6):548-53. doi: 10.1002/ppul.20046.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of the menstrual cycle on expiratory resistance during whole body exercise in females.女性全身运动呼气阻力受月经周期的影响。
J Sports Sci Med. 2008 Dec 1;7(4):475-9. eCollection 2008.
2
Impulse oscillometry in the evaluation of diseases of the airways in children.脉冲振荡法在儿童气道疾病评估中的应用。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2011 Mar;106(3):191-9. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2010.11.011. Epub 2011 Jan 6.
3
Plethysmograph and interrupter resistance measurements in prematurely born young children.早产幼儿的体积描记法和阻断器阻力测量
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2006 May;91(3):F193-6. doi: 10.1136/adc.2005.079608. Epub 2005 Oct 20.
4
Airway resistance measured by the interrupter technique: normative data for 2-10 year olds of three ethnicities.用阻断法测量气道阻力:三个种族2至10岁儿童的标准数据
Arch Dis Child. 2002 Sep;87(3):248-51. doi: 10.1136/adc.87.3.248.
5
Reference values of interrupter respiratory resistance in healthy preschool white children.健康学龄前白人儿童中呼吸阻力中断器的参考值。
Thorax. 2001 Sep;56(9):691-5. doi: 10.1136/thorax.56.9.691.