Stuart G C, McGregor S E, Duggan M A, Nation J G
Department of Oncology, University of Calgary.
CMAJ. 1997 Sep 1;157(5):513-9.
To conduct a failure analysis of cervical cancer screening among women with invasive cervical cancer in Alberta.
Descriptive study. Review of demographic, staging and treatment information from cancer registry records; generation of documented screening history from Alberta Health billing records and self-reported history from subjects who agreed to be interviewed; and comparison of findings in initial cytology reports with those from subsequent review by at least 2 pathologists of all cytology slides for each patient for the 5 years before diagnosis. Cases were assigned to 1 of 6 categories of identified screening failure.
Alberta.
All women with diagnosis of invasive cervical cancer reported to a population-based provincial cancer registry from January 1990 to December 1991.
Demographic, staging and treatment information; documented and self-reported screening histories; correlation of test results in initial cytology report with those generated from slide review; category of identified screening failure.
Of the 246 women identified with invasive cancer of the cervix, 37 (15.0%) had stage IA disease; 195 (79.3%) had squamous-cell carcinoma, and 35 (14.2%) had adenocarcinoma. According to the categories of screening failure, 74 women (30.1%) had never been screened, 38 (15.4% had not been screened within 3 years before diagnosis, 42 (17.1%) had had a false-negative cytology result, and 20 (8.1%) had been managed outside of conventional protocols. Of the 23 women (9.3%) who had been screened appropriately and had true-negative results, 19 had smears that were considered technically limited. It was not possible to classify 49 (19.9%) of the cases. Agreement between the documented and the self-reported screening histories was exact for only 39 (36.1%) of the 108 women interviewed.
Despite widespread use of opportunistic cervical screening, many women in Alberta are still not being screened adequately. In most cases women are being screened too infrequently or not at all. Self-reported screening histories are unreliable because many women may overestimate the number of smears. An organized approach to screening, as recommended by the National Workshop in Cervical Cancer Screening, may assist in reducing the incidence of invasive cervical cancer.
对艾伯塔省浸润性宫颈癌女性的宫颈癌筛查进行失败分析。
描述性研究。回顾癌症登记记录中的人口统计学、分期和治疗信息;从艾伯塔省医疗计费记录中生成有记录的筛查史,并从同意接受访谈的受试者处获取自我报告的病史;将诊断前5年每位患者的初始细胞学报告结果与随后至少2名病理学家对所有细胞学玻片复查的结果进行比较。病例被归入已确定的6种筛查失败类别中的1种。
艾伯塔省。
1990年1月至1991年12月向省级人群癌症登记处报告的所有浸润性宫颈癌女性。
人口统计学、分期和治疗信息;有记录的和自我报告的筛查史;初始细胞学报告中的检测结果与玻片复查结果的相关性;已确定的筛查失败类别。
在246名确诊为浸润性宫颈癌的女性中,37名(15.0%)患有IA期疾病;195名(79.3%)为鳞状细胞癌,35名(14.2%)为腺癌。根据筛查失败类别,74名女性(30.1%)从未接受过筛查,38名(15.4%)在诊断前3年内未接受过筛查,42名(17.1%)细胞学检查结果为假阴性,20名(8.1%)的治疗不符合常规方案。在23名(9.3%)接受过适当筛查且结果为真阴性的女性中,19名的涂片在技术上被认为存在局限性。49例(19.9%)病例无法分类。在接受访谈的108名女性中,只有39名(36.1%)的有记录筛查史与自我报告筛查史完全一致。
尽管机会性宫颈癌筛查得到广泛应用,但艾伯塔省仍有许多女性未得到充分筛查。在大多数情况下,女性接受筛查的频率过低或根本未接受筛查。自我报告的筛查史不可靠,因为许多女性可能高估了涂片检查的次数。按照宫颈癌筛查全国研讨会的建议采用有组织的筛查方法,可能有助于降低浸润性宫颈癌的发病率。