Burns G L, Walsh J A, Patterson D R, Holte C S, Sommers-Flanagan R, Parker C M
Department of Psychology, Washington State University, Pullman 99164, USA.
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1997 Aug;25(4):307-19. doi: 10.1023/a:1025764403506.
A dimensional approach was used to evaluate the internal validity of the DSM-III-R ADHD-inattention, ADHD-hyperactivity/impulsivity, oppositional defiant disorder (ODD), and conduct disorder (CD) symptoms (i.e., whether a symptom has a stronger correlation with its own dimension that the other three). Parents rated 4,019 children between the ages of 2 and 19 on these symptoms. The results showed that 5 of the 6 inattention symptoms, 3 of the 4 hyperactivity symptoms, 1 of the 4 impulsivity symptoms, 6 of the 9 oppositional defiant disorder symptoms, and 8 of the 11 CD symptoms had significant internal validity. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) found support for inattention, hyperactivity/impulsivity, oppositional defiant, and conduct disorder dimensions. Multiple-group CFA also found support for factor pattern and loading invariance across gender. The implications of these results as well as the merits of the dimensional approach to symptom validity are discussed in the context of the DSM-IV changes in ADHD, ODD, and CD.
采用维度方法评估《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第三版修订版》(DSM-III-R)中注意缺陷多动障碍的注意力不集中、多动/冲动、对立违抗性障碍(ODD)和品行障碍(CD)症状的内部效度(即某一症状与自身维度的相关性是否强于与其他三个维度的相关性)。父母对4019名2至19岁儿童的这些症状进行了评分。结果显示,6项注意力不集中症状中的5项、4项多动症状中的3项、4项冲动症状中的1项、9项对立违抗性障碍症状中的6项以及11项品行障碍症状中的8项具有显著的内部效度。验证性因素分析(CFA)支持注意力不集中、多动/冲动、对立违抗和品行障碍维度。多组CFA还支持跨性别因素模式和负荷不变性。在《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第四版》(DSM-IV)中注意缺陷多动障碍、对立违抗性障碍和品行障碍变化的背景下,讨论了这些结果的意义以及症状效度维度方法的优点。