Cohn J N, Fowler M B, Bristow M R, Colucci W S, Gilbert E M, Kinhal V, Krueger S K, Lejemtel T, Narahara K A, Packer M, Young S T, Holcslaw T L, Lukas M A
Cardiovascular Division, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis 55455, USA.
J Card Fail. 1997 Sep;3(3):173-9. doi: 10.1016/s1071-9164(97)90013-0.
Many patients remain markedly symptomatic despite optimal current therapy for heart failure. Beta-blockers have often been viewed as contraindicated in this group because of their potential adverse short-term effects on cardiac function.
One hundred thirty-one patients with severe congestive heart failure were enrolled into a double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the vasodilating beta-blocker carvedilol. All patients had symptomatic, advanced heart failure while on standard triple therapy, as evidenced by a mean ejection fraction of 0.22, marked reduction in distance traveled in a 6-minute corridor walk test, and severe impairment in quality of life measured by the Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire. After a 2-week, open-label test of 6.25 mg twice daily carvedilol, 105 patients were randomized (2:1) to receive either carvedilol (up to 25 mg twice daily, n = 70) or matching placebo (n = 35) for 6 months while background therapy with digoxin, diuretics, and an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor remained constant. Ten patients (8%) did not complete the open-label period because of adverse events and 11.4% in both the carvedilol and placebo groups dropped out in the double-blind phase. The study was terminated early by the Data Safety and Monitoring Board and follow-up evaluation was therefore aborted before the projected number of patients and follow-up time was achieved. Quality of life, which was the primary endpoint, improved similarly in the carvedilol and placebo groups, whereas the global assessment by the physicians and the patient exhibited a better response to carvedilol (P < .05). Hospitalization and mortality rate were too low to evaluate a difference, and exercise time and New York Heart Association classification did not change significantly in response to the drug. Left ventricular ejection fraction rose significantly (+0.09) in the carvedilol group compared with the placebo group (+0.02, P = .004).
The beta-blocker carvedilol can be safely employed in patients with severe heart failure. Improved left ventricular function with a trend for some improvement in symptoms combined with the experience with the drug in the larger population of less severe patients in this multicenter trial suggests that carvedilol may have a favorable long-term effect in heart failure of diverse severity.
尽管目前针对心力衰竭的治疗已达最佳水平,但仍有许多患者症状明显。由于β受体阻滞剂可能对心功能产生短期不良影响,该类药物通常被视为这类患者的禁忌。
131例严重充血性心力衰竭患者被纳入一项关于血管扩张性β受体阻滞剂卡维地洛的双盲、安慰剂对照研究。所有患者在接受标准三联疗法时均有症状性晚期心力衰竭,平均射血分数为0.22,6分钟走廊步行试验中的行走距离显著缩短,且根据明尼苏达心力衰竭生活问卷测量,生活质量严重受损。在进行为期2周、每日两次服用6.25 mg卡维地洛的开放标签试验后,105例患者被随机分组(2:1),分别接受卡维地洛(每日两次,剂量可达25 mg,n = 70)或匹配的安慰剂(n = 35)治疗6个月,同时地高辛、利尿剂和血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂的背景治疗保持不变。10例患者(8%)因不良事件未完成开放标签期,卡维地洛组和安慰剂组在双盲阶段均有11.4%的患者退出。数据安全监测委员会提前终止了该研究,因此在达到预计的患者数量和随访时间之前中止了随访评估。作为主要终点的生活质量在卡维地洛组和安慰剂组中改善情况相似,而医生和患者的整体评估显示卡维地洛组的反应更好(P < 0.05)。住院率和死亡率过低,无法评估差异,且运动时间和纽约心脏协会分级对药物治疗无显著变化。与安慰剂组(+0.02,P = 0.004)相比,卡维地洛组的左心室射血分数显著升高(+0.09)。
β受体阻滞剂卡维地洛可安全用于严重心力衰竭患者。在这项多中心试验中,左心室功能改善,症状有改善趋势,且在病情较轻的大量患者中也有使用该药物的经验,这表明卡维地洛可能对不同严重程度的心力衰竭具有良好的长期疗效。