Inclusion of Aeromonas DNA hybridization group 11 in Aeromonas encheleia and extended descriptions of the species Aeromonas eucrenophila and A. encheleia.

The recently reported chemotaxonomic and genotypic description of two well-separated subgroups (I and II) in Aeromonas eucrenophila and their affiliation to Aeromonas encheleia and the unnamed Aeromonas DNA hybridization group (HG) 11 (G. Huys, M. Altwegg, M.-L. Hänninen, M. Vancanneyt, L. Vauterin, R. Coopman, U. Torck, J. Lüthy-Hottenstein, P. Janssen, and K. Kersters, Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 19:616-623, 1996) has questioned the original species descriptions of A. eucrenophila and A. encheleia. In order to elucidate the unclear taxonomic status of these taxa in the genus Aeromonas, we have further investigated a collection of 14 reference strains and 14 related isolates encompassing the taxa A. eucrenophila subgroups I and II, A. encheleia, and HG11 by DNA-DNA hybridization (on 17 of the 28 strains) and phenotypic characterization (on all 28 strains). Genotypically, the investigated strains could be grouped into two DNA hybridization groups that exhibited between-group homologies ranging from 42 to 52%. The members of DNA homology group I (DNA binding, 76 to 100%) were strains of A. eucrenophila subgroup I, including the type strain LMG 3774, and two A. eucrenophila-like isolates, leading to the conclusion that these strains should be considered true representatives of the species A. eucrenophila. The strains of A. eucrenophila subgroup II, HG11, and A. encheleia, on the other hand, were closely joined in DNA homology group II (DNA binding, 74 to 105%) together with two presumptive A. encheleia isolates. The fact that strain LMG 16330T of A. encheleia was the only type strain residing in DNA homology group II implies that HG11 and A. eucrenophila subgroup II should be classified in the species A. encheleia. Except for the somewhat aberrant phenotypic positions of HG11 strains LMG 13075 and LMG 13076, the establishment of DNA homology groups I and II was supported by the delineation of phena 1 and 2 (level of correlation, 90%), respectively, as revealed by numerical analysis of 136 phenotypic test results. These data indicate that A. eucrenophila and A. encheleia are phenotypically highly related but can be easily separated by testing the production of acid from D-cellobiose and lactose and the assimilation of D-cellobiose. Extended descriptions of both species are given.