Roberts I
Department of Epidemiology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Inj Prev. 1995 Mar;1(1):45-8. doi: 10.1136/ip.1.1.45.
In this paper some methodological problems particularly relevant to case-control studies of injury are illustrated by reference to previous childhood injury case-control studies. In contrast to studies of disease, where 'person time' constitutes the observational experience of interest, in injury studies person time engaged in a particular activity to often more appropriate. The implications for the definition of the study base are discussed. The potential for hospital admission bias in injury case-control studies is considered along with potential strategies for avoiding it. The importance of errors in exposure measurement, including those arising from inappropriate induction time assumptions, are illustrated. Finally, the potential for bias resulting from the combination of etiologically unrelated injury outcomes into a single outcome measure is illustrated and discussed.
在本文中,通过参考以往儿童期伤害病例对照研究,阐述了一些与伤害病例对照研究特别相关的方法学问题。与疾病研究不同,在疾病研究中“人时”构成了感兴趣的观察经历,而在伤害研究中,从事特定活动的人时往往更为合适。文中讨论了对研究基础定义的影响。考虑了伤害病例对照研究中医院入院偏倚的可能性以及避免该偏倚的潜在策略。说明了暴露测量误差的重要性,包括因不适当的诱导时间假设而产生的误差。最后,阐述并讨论了将病因无关的伤害结局合并为单一结局指标所导致偏倚的可能性。