Versiani M, Oggero U, Alterwain P, Capponi R, Dajas F, Heinze-Martin G, Marquez C A, Poleo M A, Rivero-Almanzor L E, Rossel L
Instituto de Psiquiatria da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Br J Psychiatry Suppl. 1989 Oct(6):72-7.
Patients (n = 490) suffering from a major depressive episode according to DSM-III criteria were randomly allocated to groups receiving either moclobemide, imipramine, or placebo treatment. Subjects were treated as out-patients for 6 weeks. On overall assessment of efficacy and on results of the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, both moclobemide and imipramine were superior to placebo, but the differences between moclobemide and imipramine were not significant. Premature termination due to insufficient efficacy was more frequent with placebo than with moclobemide or with imipramine, these differences being significant. The overall assessment of tolerance clearly favoured placebo and moclobemide over imipramine. This was also reflected in the frequency of premature terminations due to poor tolerance, as well as in the frequency of adverse events, which were highest in the imipramine group. The only cardiovascular finding was an increase of the mean heart rate with imipramine, maximum at the end of week 1, while placebo and moclobemide displayed no relevant changes. There were no other important drug-related changes.
根据《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版(DSM-III)标准,患有重度抑郁发作的490名患者被随机分配到接受吗氯贝胺、丙咪嗪或安慰剂治疗的组中。受试者作为门诊患者接受6周治疗。在疗效的总体评估以及汉密尔顿抑郁量表的结果方面,吗氯贝胺和丙咪嗪均优于安慰剂,但吗氯贝胺与丙咪嗪之间的差异不显著。因疗效不佳导致的提前终止治疗在安慰剂组比吗氯贝胺组或丙咪嗪组更频繁,这些差异具有显著性。耐受性的总体评估明显显示,安慰剂和吗氯贝胺比丙咪嗪更具优势。这也体现在因耐受性差导致的提前终止治疗的频率上,以及不良事件的频率上,丙咪嗪组的不良事件频率最高。唯一的心血管方面的发现是丙咪嗪使平均心率增加,在第1周结束时达到最大值,而安慰剂和吗氯贝胺没有显示出相关变化。没有其他重要的与药物相关的变化。