Raymond J, Davis G M, Fahey A, Climstein M, Sutton J R
Rehabilitation Research Centre, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Lidcombe, NSW, Australia.
Spinal Cord. 1997 Oct;35(10):680-5. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3100476.
The purpose of this study was to compare the oxygen uptake and heart rate responses during submaximal arm cranking to combined arm cranking + electrical stimulation (ES)-induced leg cycling in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). Seven subjects with paraplegia (T4-T12) performed combined arm and leg cycling exercise for 5 min, followed by arm cranking alone at the same power output for a further 5 min. During both exercise conditions, steady state oxygen consumption (VO2), carbon dioxide output (VCO2), expired ventilation (VE) and heart rate (HR) were determined. The respiratory exchange ratio (RER) and oxygen pulse were calculated from the measured variables. During combined arm + electrical stimulation-induced leg cycling exercise, the VO2 was 25% higher (1.58 l min-1 vs 1.26 l min-1), but the HR was 13% lower (132 b min-1 vs 149 b min-1), than during arm cranking exercise alone. Oxygen pulse and VCO2 were also significantly higher (by 42% and 25%, respectively) during combined arm + ES-induced leg exercise, but there were no differences between the two exercise conditions for VE or RER. These data suggest that the absence of the leg 'muscle pump' and a reduced venous return of blood to the heart elevate exercise heart rates during submaximal arm cranking. Conversely, combined arm cranking + ES-induced leg cycling exercise provides the body with a greater metabolic stress than arm cranking alone, while reducing the cardiac stress. The mechanism explaining the heart rate response, however, remains unclear, but may have been influenced by the blood pressure variations across the range of lesions. The findings from this study may have implications for the relative benefit of combined arm + ES-induced leg cycling training for people with paraplegia.
本研究的目的是比较脊髓损伤(SCI)个体在次最大强度手臂曲柄运动与联合手臂曲柄运动+电刺激(ES)诱导的腿部循环运动期间的摄氧量和心率反应。7名截瘫(T4-T12)受试者先进行5分钟的手臂和腿部联合循环运动,然后以相同功率输出单独进行5分钟的手臂曲柄运动。在两种运动条件下,均测定了稳态耗氧量(VO2)、二氧化碳排出量(VCO2)、呼出通气量(VE)和心率(HR)。根据测量变量计算呼吸交换率(RER)和氧脉搏。在联合手臂+电刺激诱导的腿部循环运动期间,VO2比单独进行手臂曲柄运动时高25%(1.58升/分钟对1.26升/分钟),但HR低13%(132次/分钟对149次/分钟)。联合手臂+ES诱导的腿部运动期间,氧脉搏和VCO2也显著更高(分别高42%和25%),但两种运动条件下的VE或RER没有差异。这些数据表明,在次最大强度手臂曲柄运动期间,腿部“肌肉泵”的缺失以及回心血量减少会提高运动心率。相反,联合手臂曲柄运动+ES诱导的腿部循环运动比单独的手臂曲柄运动给身体带来更大的代谢压力,同时降低心脏压力。然而,解释心率反应的机制仍不清楚,但可能受到损伤范围内血压变化的影响。本研究的结果可能对截瘫患者联合手臂+ES诱导的腿部循环训练的相对益处具有启示意义。