Maintaining theophylline compliance/adherence in severely asthmatic children: the role of psychologic functioning of the child and family.

BACKGROUND

Noncompliance with asthma therapy by asthmatic children and their families is a common cause of treatment failure. Psychologic factors have been reported to influence adherence patterns.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the relationship of psychologic function of severely asthmatic children and families with theophylline compliance during a 1-year follow-up period after inpatient asthma rehabilitation.

METHOD

Thirty-seven severely asthmatic children with a median age of 9 years (range, 2 to 17 years) were treated in an inpatient rehabilitation program (median, 15 days). Established clinical rating scales of psychologic adjustment were used for children (Child Global Assessment Scale) and families (Family Global Assessment Scale) at the time of admission. Patients were defined as noncompliant if 30% or more of theophylline levels obtained during the 1-year follow-up period were less than 5 mg/L (mumol/L).

RESULTS

Compliant children had higher scores on the Child Global Assessment Scale than noncompliant children (64 versus 48, P = .09). Families of compliant children had significantly higher scores on the Family Global Assessment Scale than did families with noncompliant children (63 versus 54, P < .05). There was no statistical relationship between compliance status and parent-reported behavior problems, demographic factors (age, race, sex, and number of parents at home), health insurance, specialty referral at admission, measures of medical morbidity (days hospitalized, number of emergency care visits, and number of corticosteroid bursts), or length of rehabilitation stay. Both compliant and noncompliant children had comparable reductions in morbidity (hospital and emergency care, number of corticosteroid bursts required).

CONCLUSION

Psychologic functioning of the child and family may be related to theophylline compliance.