• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项为期24个月的研究,比较窝沟封闭剂和氟保护漆对不同恒牙第一磨牙表面龋齿减少情况的影响。

A 24-month study comparing sealant and fluoride varnish in caries reduction on different permanent first molar surfaces.

作者信息

Bravo M, Baca P, Llodra J C, Osorio E

机构信息

Departamento de Odontología Preventiva, Facultad de Odontología, Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain.

出版信息

J Public Health Dent. 1997 Summer;57(3):184-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.1997.tb02972.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1752-7325.1997.tb02972.x
PMID:9383759
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the separate effects of dental sealants and fluoride varnish on dental caries in fissured and nonfissured surfaces of permanent first molars.

METHODS

A clinical trial was conducted with three groups of 6- to 8-year-old schoolchildren: a sealant group (n = 100), in which Delton was applied to first molars; a varnish group (n = 98), in which Duraphat was applied to first molars; and a control group (n = 116), which had no intervention as part of the study. Absolute and percent caries reductions were compared at 24 months.

RESULTS

Compared to the controls, sealants resulted in a 68 percent and 87 percent reduction on fissured and nonfissured surfaces, respectively. The corresponding figures for varnish were 38 percent and 66 percent.

CONCLUSION

Sealant and fluoride varnish are effective in preventing caries in both fissured and nonfissured surface.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定窝沟封闭剂和氟漆对恒牙第一磨牙窝沟及非窝沟表面龋齿的单独作用。

方法

对三组6至8岁学童进行了一项临床试验:窝沟封闭剂组(n = 100),对第一磨牙应用Delton;氟漆组(n = 98),对第一磨牙应用Duraphat;对照组(n = 116),作为研究的一部分不进行干预。在24个月时比较龋齿减少的绝对值和百分比。

结果

与对照组相比,窝沟封闭剂使窝沟表面和非窝沟表面的龋齿分别减少了68%和87%。氟漆的相应数字分别为38%和66%。

结论

窝沟封闭剂和氟漆在预防窝沟及非窝沟表面龋齿方面均有效。

相似文献

1
A 24-month study comparing sealant and fluoride varnish in caries reduction on different permanent first molar surfaces.一项为期24个月的研究,比较窝沟封闭剂和氟保护漆对不同恒牙第一磨牙表面龋齿减少情况的影响。
J Public Health Dent. 1997 Summer;57(3):184-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.1997.tb02972.x.
2
Effectiveness of visible light fissure sealant (Delton) versus fluoride varnish (Duraphat): 24-month clinical trial.可见光窝沟封闭剂(Delton)与氟化物漆(Duraphat)的有效性:24个月临床试验。
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1996 Feb;24(1):42-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1996.tb00811.x.
3
Sealant and fluoride varnish in caries: a randomized trial.龋齿治疗中使用的窝沟封闭剂和氟化物清漆:一项随机试验。
J Dent Res. 2005 Dec;84(12):1138-43. doi: 10.1177/154405910508401209.
4
Pit and fissure sealants versus fluoride varnishes for preventing dental decay in the permanent teeth of children and adolescents.用于预防儿童和青少年恒牙龋齿的窝沟封闭剂与氟化物涂剂对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 4;11(11):CD003067. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003067.pub5.
5
Pit and fissure sealants versus fluoride varnishes for preventing dental decay in the permanent teeth of children and adolescents.窝沟封闭剂与氟化物漆预防儿童和青少年恒牙龋齿的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jan 18;2016(1):CD003067. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003067.pub4.
6
A 48-month survival analysis comparing sealant (Delton) with fluoride varnish (Duraphat) in 6- to 8-year-old children.一项针对6至8岁儿童,比较封闭剂(德尔顿)与氟化物漆(Duraphat)的48个月生存分析。
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1997 Jun;25(3):247-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1997.tb00935.x.
7
Protocol for "Seal or Varnish?" (SoV) trial: a randomised controlled trial to measure the relative cost and effectiveness of pit and fissure sealants and fluoride varnish in preventing dental decay.“密封还是上釉?”(SoV)试验方案:一项随机对照试验,旨在衡量窝沟封闭剂和氟化物涂料在预防龋齿方面的相对成本和效果。
BMC Oral Health. 2012 Nov 20;12:51. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-12-51.
8
Randomized trial on fluorides and sealants for fissure caries prevention.随机氟化物和窝沟封闭剂预防窝沟龋的临床试验。
J Dent Res. 2012 Aug;91(8):753-8. doi: 10.1177/0022034512452278. Epub 2012 Jun 26.
9
Sealant versus Fluoride in Primary Molars of Kindergarten Children Regularly Receiving Fluoride Varnish: One-Year Randomized Clinical Trial Follow-Up.在定期接受氟化物涂漆的幼儿园儿童乳磨牙中,窝沟封闭剂与氟化物的比较:一年随机临床试验随访
Caries Res. 2015;49(4):458-66. doi: 10.1159/000431038. Epub 2015 Jul 29.
10
A 2-year clinical evaluation of sealed noncavitated approximal posterior carious lesions in adolescents.青少年后牙邻面非龋洞性封闭龋损的2年临床评估
Clin Oral Investig. 2005 Dec;9(4):239-43. doi: 10.1007/s00784-005-0010-7. Epub 2005 Sep 16.

引用本文的文献

1
[Meta-analysis of sealants versus fluoride varnishes for the prevention of occlusal surface caries in children's first permanent molars].[窝沟封闭剂与氟漆预防儿童第一恒磨牙咬合面龋的Meta分析]
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2025 Jun 1;43(3):383-394. doi: 10.7518/hxkq.2025.2024418.
2
Eruption and caries status of first permanent molars in children aged 6-7 years in Shijingshan District, Beijing, China.中国北京市石景山区 6-7 岁儿童第一恒磨牙萌出及患龋状况。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Sep 27;24(1):1143. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04915-1.
3
Clinical effectiveness of pit and fissure sealants in primary and permanent teeth of children and adolescents: an umbrella review.
儿童和青少年乳牙和恒牙窝沟封闭剂的临床效果:伞式综述。
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2024 Jun;25(3):289-315. doi: 10.1007/s40368-024-00876-9. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
4
Effect of Fluoride Varnish in Preventing Dental Caries of First Permanent Molars: A 24-Month Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.氟保护漆预防第一恒磨牙龋齿的效果:一项 24 个月的整群随机对照试验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 11;19(24):16656. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192416656.
5
Pit and Fissure Sealant versus Fluoride Varnish for the Prevention of Dental Caries in School Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.窝沟封闭剂与氟化物涂料预防学龄儿童龋齿的效果比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Clin Pract. 2022 Sep 20;2022:8635254. doi: 10.1155/2022/8635254. eCollection 2022.
6
Pit and fissure sealants versus fluoride varnishes for preventing dental decay in the permanent teeth of children and adolescents.用于预防儿童和青少年恒牙龋齿的窝沟封闭剂与氟化物涂剂对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 4;11(11):CD003067. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003067.pub5.
7
Caries-Preventive Effect of a Public Health Programme for Pit and Fissure Sealant.一项针对窝沟封闭剂的公共卫生项目的防龋效果
Oral Health Prev Dent. 2020 Jul 4;18(3):593-599. doi: 10.3290/j.ohpd.a44695.
8
Surface-Specific Caries Preventive Effect of an Intervention Comprising Fissure Sealant, Povidone-Iodine and Fluoride Varnish in a Remote Indigenous Community in Australia.表面特异性龋齿预防效果的干预包括窝沟封闭剂、聚维酮碘和氟保护漆在澳大利亚偏远的土著社区。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 23;17(6):2114. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17062114.
9
Effectiveness of fluoride varnish on caries in the first molars of primary schoolchildren: a 3-year longitudinal study in Guangxi Province, China.氟保护漆对小学生第一恒磨牙龋病的疗效:中国广西的一项 3 年纵向研究。
Int Dent J. 2020 Apr;70(2):108-115. doi: 10.1111/idj.12528. Epub 2019 Nov 8.
10
Dental caries prevention strategies among children and adolescents with immigrant - or low socioeconomic backgrounds- do they work? A systematic review.针对具有移民背景或社会经济地位较低的儿童和青少年的龋齿预防策略——这些策略有效吗?一项系统综述。
BMC Oral Health. 2018 Feb 7;18(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12903-018-0478-6.