Biedenbach D J, Jones R N
Department of Pathology, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City 52242, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 1997 Dec;35(12):3198-202. doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.12.3198-3202.1997.
Two new oxazolidinones were tested to determine interpretive susceptibility testing criteria for MIC and disk diffusion methods. Commercial lots of linezolid (formerly U-100766) and eperezolid (formerly U-100592) disks containing 30 microg of drug were tested against 728 isolates of bacteria with defined mechanisms of resistance. Results from linezolid were highlighted because of its choice for clinical development. By using preliminary pharmacokinetic data, a tentative susceptibility breakpoint of < or = 4 microg/ml was selected. Corresponding breakpoint zone diameters for linezolid were > or = 21 mm (< or = 4 microg/ml) for susceptibility and < or = 17 mm (> or = 16 microg/ml) for resistance. Regression statistics demonstrated a high correlation coefficient (r > or = 0.98), and absolute categorical agreement between methods was obtained, when staphylococci and enterococci were tested with the cited criteria. When Streptococcus spp. (including S. pneumoniae) were tested, only the susceptibility breakpoint was suggested. Quality control (QC) guidelines for linezolid disk diffusion tests were established by a multilaboratory trial as follows: 27 to 31 mm for Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923 and 28 to 34 mm for S. pneumoniae ATCC 49619. More than 95% of all QC results were within these proposed ranges. Although not advanced to clinical trials, eperezolid demonstrated potency comparable to that of linezolid and had identical interpretive testing criteria. These preliminary interpretive criteria and QC limits (accepted by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards) should be applied to linezolid tests during the clinical-trial phases of oxazolidinone drug development in order to ensure test accuracy and reproducibility.
对两种新型恶唑烷酮进行了测试,以确定针对MIC和纸片扩散法的解释性药敏试验标准。用含30微克药物的利奈唑胺(原U - 100766)和依哌唑胺(原U - 100592)商业批次纸片,对728株具有明确耐药机制的细菌进行了测试。由于利奈唑胺被选用于临床开发,因此突出显示了其结果。根据初步药代动力学数据,选择了≤4微克/毫升的暂定药敏断点。利奈唑胺相应的断点区域直径为:药敏时≥21毫米(≤4微克/毫升),耐药时≤17毫米(≥16微克/毫升)。回归统计显示相关系数较高(r≥0.98),当用上述标准对葡萄球菌和肠球菌进行测试时,两种方法之间获得了绝对的分类一致性。对链球菌属(包括肺炎链球菌)进行测试时,仅提出了药敏断点。通过多实验室试验建立了利奈唑胺纸片扩散试验的质量控制(QC)指南如下:金黄色葡萄球菌ATCC 25923为27至31毫米,肺炎链球菌ATCC 49619为28至34毫米。所有QC结果中超过95%在这些建议范围内。尽管依哌唑胺未进入临床试验阶段,但它显示出与利奈唑胺相当的效力,并且具有相同的解释性测试标准。在恶唑烷酮药物开发的临床试验阶段,这些初步解释性标准和QC限度(已被美国国家临床实验室标准委员会接受)应应用于利奈唑胺试验,以确保测试的准确性和可重复性。