Suppr超能文献

慢性腹膜透析患者的总体水和身体成分

Total body water and body composition in chronic peritoneal dialysis patients.

作者信息

Arkouche W, Fouque D, Pachiaudi C, Normand S, Laville M, Delawari E, Riou J P, Traeger J, La Ville M

机构信息

Association pour l'Utilisation du Rein Artificiel, Lyon, France.

出版信息

J Am Soc Nephrol. 1997 Dec;8(12):1906-14. doi: 10.1681/ASN.V8121906.

Abstract

In this investigation, total body water (TBW) in ten chronic peritoneal dialysis patients was studied by deuterium (TBW-2H), skinfold thickness (TBW-ST), Watson formula (TBW-WA), 58% of body weight (TBW-58%), and bioelectrical impedance (TBW-BIA), and these results were compared with the reference oxygen18 (TBW-18O) method. We also analyzed the fat-free mass (FFM) by skinfold thickness (FFM-ST), bioelectrical impedance (FFM-BIA), oxygen18 (FFM-18O), and creatinine kinetics method (FFM-CK). In addition, resting metabolic rate was measured by indirect calorimetry. Compared with TBW-18O, TBW-58% and TBW-BIA were significantly different (P < 0.01). TBW-2H overestimated TBW-18O by 4.3%. TBW-ST and TBW-WA gave slightly greater values than TBW-18O, although these values were nonstatistically significant. The best prediction of total body water from these methods was obtained with the Watson formula. When Kt/V was calculated from these results, the values obtained were statistically greater (BIA, P < 0.001) and smaller (58% BW, P < 0.01) than those obtained with either 18O or Watson formula. The fat-free mass estimation also led to discrepant findings. Indeed, FFM-CK was significantly lower (P < 0.05) as compared with FFM-ST, FFM-BIA, or FFM-18O. Resting metabolic rate was strongly correlated with FFM estimated by skinfold thickness (r = 0.91, P < 0.001), bioelectrical impedance (r = 0.85, P < 0.005), and 18O (r = 0.77, P < 0.01), but not when fat-free mass was estimated by the creatinine kinetic method. The water content of fat-free mass estimated by skinfold thickness was found to be 69.7 +/- 6.9% in these patients, a value lower than the standard 73.2% found in healthy adults. This study confirms that there is an abnormal water distribution in chronic peritoneal dialysis patients. However, when compared with the oxygen18 reference method, the Watson formula allows a reliable estimation of Kt/V.

摘要

在本研究中,通过氘(TBW - 2H)、皮褶厚度(TBW - ST)、沃森公式(TBW - WA)、体重的58%(TBW - 58%)和生物电阻抗(TBW - BIA)对10例慢性腹膜透析患者的全身水含量(TBW)进行了研究,并将这些结果与参考的氧18(TBW - 18O)方法进行比较。我们还通过皮褶厚度(FFM - ST)、生物电阻抗(FFM - BIA)、氧18(FFM - 18O)和肌酐动力学方法(FFM - CK)分析了去脂体重(FFM)。此外,通过间接量热法测量静息代谢率。与TBW - 18O相比,TBW - 58%和TBW - BIA有显著差异(P < 0.01)。TBW - 2H比TBW - 18O高估了4.3%。TBW - ST和TBW - WA得出的值略高于TBW - 18O,尽管这些值无统计学意义。这些方法中对全身水含量的最佳预测是通过沃森公式获得的。根据这些结果计算Kt/V时,所得到的值在统计学上比用18O或沃森公式得到的值更大(BIA,P < 0.001)和更小(58%体重,P < 0.01)。去脂体重估计也得出了不一致的结果。实际上,与FFM - ST、FFM - BIA或FFM - 18O相比,FFM - CK显著更低(P < 0.05)。静息代谢率与通过皮褶厚度估计的FFM(r = 0.91,P < 0.001)、生物电阻抗(r = 0.85,P < 0.005)和18O(r = 0.77,P < 0.01)密切相关,但当通过肌酐动力学方法估计去脂体重时则不然。通过皮褶厚度估计的这些患者去脂体重的水含量为69.7±6.9%,低于健康成年人的标准73.2%。本研究证实慢性腹膜透析患者存在异常的水分布。然而,与氧18参考方法相比,沃森公式能够可靠地估计Kt/V。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验