Grober E, Merling A, Heimlich T, Lipton R B
Saul Korey Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461, USA.
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1997 Oct;19(5):643-54. doi: 10.1080/01688639708403750.
Free and Cued Selective Reminding (FCSR) differs from Selective Reminding (SR) because of a study procedure which controls cognitive processing and a reminding procedure which allows for cued recall. Performance on FCSR and SR was compared in two studies to determine which test produces better recall and to identify the factors that account for the superior recall. When the tests were administered to very elderly normal subjects using the standard clinical protocol, twice as many words were retrieved from long-term memory in FCSR than SR. The second experiment, which manipulated study and reminding conditions in a younger sample of normal elderly, suggests that the improvement in free recall was due to the study procedure and the method of reminding.
自由与线索提示性回忆（FCSR）与选择性回忆（SR）不同，因为它有一个控制认知加工的研究程序和一个允许线索回忆的提示程序。在两项研究中比较了FCSR和SR的表现，以确定哪种测试能产生更好的回忆，并找出导致更好回忆的因素。当使用标准临床方案对非常年长的正常受试者进行测试时，FCSR从长期记忆中检索出的单词数量是SR的两倍。第二项实验对年轻的正常老年人样本的学习和提示条件进行了操纵，结果表明自由回忆的改善归因于学习程序和提示方法。
