Suppr超能文献

无气腹腔镜与传统二氧化碳气腹腹腔镜胆囊切除术的比较

A comparison of gasless mechanical and conventional carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum methods for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

作者信息

Koivusalo A M, Kellokumpu I, Scheinin M, Tikkanen I, Mäkisalo H, Lindgren L

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia, University of Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

Anesth Analg. 1998 Jan;86(1):153-8. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199801000-00031.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Carbon dioxide (CO2) insufflation with increased intraabdominal pressure (IAP) has adverse hemodynamic, pulmonary, and renal effects. To avoid these problems, an abdominal wall lift method with a retractor was used to provide the surgical view without CO2 insufflation. Twenty-six patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly allocated to either the gasless, retractor group, or conventional CO2 pneumoperitoneum group (CPP). Hemodynamic data, ventilatory variables, urine output, urine oxygen tension, and blood samples for determining stress hormones were collected throughout the perioperative period. Patients in the retractor group had lower mean arterial pressure, heart rate, and central venous pressure (P < 0.001). They also had higher pulmonary dynamic compliance and needed a lower minute volume of ventilation to achieve normocarbia (P < 0.001). Urine output and oxygen tension in urine were higher (P < 0.05) with the retractor method than with CPP. Increase in plasma renin activity (P < 0.05) and decrease in core temperature (P < 0.001) were smaller with the gasless method than with CPP. The gasless method for laparoscopic cholecystectomy might be beneficial, especially in patients with compromised cardiorespiratory or renal function.

IMPLICATIONS

Totally gasless laparoscopic cholecystectomy was compared with conventional pressure pneumoperitoneum with CO2 insufflation. The gasless method resulted in more stable hemodynamics and pulmonary function, as well as higher urine, output than conventional pressure pneumoperitoneum. No changes in renal oxygenation was seen with the gasless method, compared with conventional pressure pneumoperitoneum.

摘要

未标注

腹腔内压力(IAP)升高的二氧化碳(CO₂)气腹会产生不良的血流动力学、肺部和肾脏影响。为避免这些问题,采用了一种使用牵开器的腹壁提升方法来提供手术视野,而不进行CO₂气腹。26例行择期腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者被随机分配至无气腹牵开器组或传统CO₂气腹组(CPP)。在整个围手术期收集血流动力学数据、通气变量、尿量、尿氧分压以及用于测定应激激素的血样。牵开器组患者的平均动脉压、心率和中心静脉压较低(P<0.001)。他们还具有更高的肺动态顺应性,并且为达到正常碳酸血症所需的分钟通气量更低(P<0.001)。与CPP相比,牵开器方法的尿量和尿氧分压更高(P<0.05)。无气腹方法导致的血浆肾素活性升高(P<0.05)和核心体温降低(P<0.001)比CPP更小。腹腔镜胆囊切除术的无气腹方法可能有益,尤其是对于心肺或肾功能受损的患者。

启示

将完全无气腹的腹腔镜胆囊切除术与传统的CO₂气腹压力气腹进行了比较。无气腹方法导致血流动力学和肺功能更稳定,并且尿量比传统压力气腹更高。与传统压力气腹相比,无气腹方法未观察到肾氧合的变化。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验