Pogue J, Yusuf S
Division of Cardiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Lancet. 1998 Jan 3;351(9095):47-52. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)08461-4.
For a meta-analysis to give definitive information, it should meet at least the minimum standards that would be expected of a well-designed, adequately powered, and carefully conducted randomised controlled trial. These minimum standards include both qualitative characteristics--a prospective protocol, comparable definitions of key outcomes, quality control of data, and inclusion of all patients from all trials in the final analysis--and quantitative standards--an assessment of whether the total sample is large enough to provide reliable results and the use of appropriate statistical monitoring guidelines to indicate when the results of the accumulating data of a meta-analysis are conclusive. We believe that rigorous meta-analyses undertaken according to these principles will lead to more reliable evidence about the efficacy and safety of interventions than either retrospective meta-analysis or individual trials.
为了使荟萃分析能够提供确切的信息,它应至少符合精心设计、有足够效力且严谨实施的随机对照试验所应达到的最低标准。这些最低标准包括定性特征——前瞻性方案、关键结局的可比定义、数据质量控制以及在最终分析中纳入所有试验的所有患者——和定量标准——评估总样本量是否足够大以提供可靠结果,以及使用适当的统计监测指南来表明荟萃分析累积数据的结果何时具有决定性。我们认为,按照这些原则进行的严谨荟萃分析将比回顾性荟萃分析或单个试验产生关于干预措施疗效和安全性的更可靠证据。