Mind, Brain and Behavior Research Center (CIMCYC), University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Nat Hum Behav. 2023 Jun;7(6):928-941. doi: 10.1038/s41562-023-01554-4. Epub 2023 Mar 27.
Extensive research links regular physical exercise to an overall enhancement of cognitive function across the lifespan. Here we assess the causal evidence supporting this relationship in the healthy population, using an umbrella review of meta-analyses limited to randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Despite most of the 24 reviewed meta-analyses reporting a positive overall effect, our assessment reveals evidence of low statistical power in the primary RCTs, selective inclusion of studies, publication bias and large variation in combinations of pre-processing and analytic decisions. In addition, our meta-analysis of all the primary RCTs included in the revised meta-analyses shows small exercise-related benefits (d = 0.22, 95% confidence interval 0.16 to 0.28) that became substantially smaller after accounting for key moderators (that is, active control and baseline differences; d = 0.13, 95% confidence interval 0.07 to 0.20), and negligible after correcting for publication bias (d = 0.05, 95% confidence interval -0.09 to 0.14). These findings suggest caution in claims and recommendations linking regular physical exercise to cognitive benefits in the healthy human population until more reliable causal evidence accumulates.
大量研究将定期进行体育锻炼与整个生命周期内认知功能的全面提高联系起来。在这里,我们使用仅限于随机对照试验(RCT)的荟萃分析伞式审查,评估支持健康人群中这种关系的因果证据。尽管 24 项综述的荟萃分析报告大多数都有积极的总体效果,但我们的评估表明,主要 RCT 中的统计功效较低,研究存在选择性纳入,存在发表偏倚,预处理和分析决策的组合存在较大差异。此外,我们对所有纳入修订后的荟萃分析的主要 RCT 进行的荟萃分析显示,运动相关的益处较小(d = 0.22,95%置信区间 0.16 至 0.28),在考虑到关键调节因素(即主动对照和基线差异)后,这些益处显著变小(d = 0.13,95%置信区间 0.07 至 0.20),在纠正发表偏倚后,这些益处可以忽略不计(d = 0.05,95%置信区间 -0.09 至 0.14)。这些发现表明,在积累更可靠的因果证据之前,在健康人群中将定期进行体育锻炼与认知益处联系起来的说法和建议需要谨慎。