Gauderman W J, Faucett C L, Morrison J L, Carpenter C L
Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles 90033, USA.
Genet Epidemiol. 1997;14(6):993-8. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2272(1997)14:6<993::AID-GEPI72>3.0.CO;2-F.
Our goal was to determine the degree to which joint segregation and linkage analysis leads to increased efficiency for estimating the recombination fraction and to greater power for detecting linkage, compared to separate analyses. We concentrated on the quantitative phenotype Q2 and analyzed linkage with a tightly linked marker, a loosely linked marker, and eight unlinked markers, the latter chosen to evaluate false positive rates. We considered both nuclear-family and extended-pedigree data, using the 200 replicates of each provided to GAW participants. We found joint analysis to be consistently more efficient, with relative efficiencies for the tightly linked marker of 1.16 and 1.06 in extended pedigrees and nuclear families, respectively. These relative efficiencies translated into modest but consistent gains in power to detect linkage. Both methods appear to produce unbiased parameter estimates and similar false positive rates.
我们的目标是确定与单独分析相比,联合分离分析和连锁分析在多大程度上提高了估计重组率的效率以及检测连锁的能力。我们专注于数量性状Q2,并分析了与紧密连锁标记、松散连锁标记以及八个不连锁标记的连锁关系,选择后者来评估假阳性率。我们考虑了核心家系和扩展家系数据,使用了提供给GAW参与者的每种数据的200个重复样本。我们发现联合分析始终更有效,在扩展家系和核心家系中,紧密连锁标记的相对效率分别为1.16和1.06。这些相对效率转化为检测连锁能力的适度但一致的提高。两种方法似乎都能产生无偏参数估计和相似的假阳性率。