Suppr超能文献

与单独分析相比,数量性状的联合分离和连锁分析。

Joint segregation and linkage analysis of a quantitative trait compared to separate analyses.

作者信息

Gauderman W J, Faucett C L, Morrison J L, Carpenter C L

机构信息

Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles 90033, USA.

出版信息

Genet Epidemiol. 1997;14(6):993-8. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2272(1997)14:6<993::AID-GEPI72>3.0.CO;2-F.

Abstract

Our goal was to determine the degree to which joint segregation and linkage analysis leads to increased efficiency for estimating the recombination fraction and to greater power for detecting linkage, compared to separate analyses. We concentrated on the quantitative phenotype Q2 and analyzed linkage with a tightly linked marker, a loosely linked marker, and eight unlinked markers, the latter chosen to evaluate false positive rates. We considered both nuclear-family and extended-pedigree data, using the 200 replicates of each provided to GAW participants. We found joint analysis to be consistently more efficient, with relative efficiencies for the tightly linked marker of 1.16 and 1.06 in extended pedigrees and nuclear families, respectively. These relative efficiencies translated into modest but consistent gains in power to detect linkage. Both methods appear to produce unbiased parameter estimates and similar false positive rates.

摘要

我们的目标是确定与单独分析相比,联合分离分析和连锁分析在多大程度上提高了估计重组率的效率以及检测连锁的能力。我们专注于数量性状Q2,并分析了与紧密连锁标记、松散连锁标记以及八个不连锁标记的连锁关系,选择后者来评估假阳性率。我们考虑了核心家系和扩展家系数据,使用了提供给GAW参与者的每种数据的200个重复样本。我们发现联合分析始终更有效,在扩展家系和核心家系中,紧密连锁标记的相对效率分别为1.16和1.06。这些相对效率转化为检测连锁能力的适度但一致的提高。两种方法似乎都能产生无偏参数估计和相似的假阳性率。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验