Heath S C, Snow G L, Thompson E A, Tseng C, Wijsman E M
Department of Statistics, University of Washington, Seattle 98195-4322, USA.
Genet Epidemiol. 1997;14(6):1011-6. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2272(1997)14:6<1011::AID-GEPI75>3.0.CO;2-L.
Our objective was to infer the genetic model for the quantitative traits using a variety of methods developed in our group. Only a single data set was analyzed in any one analysis, although some comparison between data sets was made. In addition, the simulated model was not known during the course of the analysis. Basic modeling and segregation analyses for the five quantitative traits was followed by several simple genome scans to indicate areas of interest. A Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) multipoint quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping approach was then used to estimate the posterior probabilities of linkage of QTL to each chromosome simultaneously with trait model parameters, and to further localize the genes. Comparisons between the nuclear family and pedigree data sets indicated a greater power for QTL detection and mapping with the pedigree data sets. Even with the pedigree data, however, precise localization of the QTL did not appear to be possible using single replicate data sets. Two of the three genes with effects on trait Q1 were detected by the MCMC method.
我们的目标是使用我们团队开发的多种方法来推断数量性状的遗传模型。在任何一次分析中仅分析单个数据集,尽管对数据集之间进行了一些比较。此外,在分析过程中并不知道模拟模型。对这五个数量性状进行基本建模和分离分析后,进行了几次简单的基因组扫描以指明感兴趣的区域。然后使用马尔可夫链蒙特卡罗(MCMC)多点数量性状基因座(QTL)定位方法,来同时估计QTL与每条染色体连锁的后验概率以及性状模型参数,并进一步定位基因。核心家系数据集和系谱数据集之间的比较表明,系谱数据集在QTL检测和定位方面具有更大的功效。然而,即使使用系谱数据,利用单个重复数据集似乎也无法对QTL进行精确定位。MCMC方法检测到了对性状Q1有影响的三个基因中的两个。