Sibille I, Sime-Ngando T, Mathieu L, Block J C
Laboratoire d'Hygiène et de Recherche en Santé Publique, GIP Stelor Vandoeuvre-Lès-Nancy, France.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998 Jan;64(1):197-202. doi: 10.1128/AEM.64.1.197-202.1998.
The development of bacterial communities in drinking water distribution systems leads to a food chain which supports the growth of macroorganisms incompatible with water quality requirements and esthetics. Nevertheless, very few studies have examined the microbial communities in drinking water distribution systems and their trophic relationships. This study was done to quantify the microbial communities (especially bacteria and protozoa) and obtain direct and indirect proof of protozoan feeding on bacteria in two distribution networks, one of GAC water (i.e., water filtered on granular activated carbon) and the other of nanofiltered water. The nanofiltered water-supplied network contained no organisms larger than bacteria, either in the water phase (on average, 5 x 10(7) bacterial cells liter-1) or in the biofilm (on average, 7 x 10(6) bacterial cells cm-2). No protozoa were detected in the whole nanofiltered water-supplied network (water plus biofilm). In contrast, the GAC water-supplied network contained bacteria (on average, 3 x 10(8) cells liter-1 in water and 4 x 10(7) cells cm-2 in biofilm) and protozoa (on average, 10(5) cells liter-1 in water and 10(3) cells cm-2 in biofilm). The water contained mostly flagellates (93%), ciliates (1.8%), thecamoebae (1.6%), and naked amoebae (1.1%). The biofilm had only ciliates (52%) and thecamoebae (48%). Only the ciliates at the solid-liquid interface of the GAC water-supplied network had a measurable grazing activity in laboratory test (estimated at 2 bacteria per ciliate per h). Protozoan ingestion of bacteria was indirectly shown by adding Escherichia coli to the experimental distribution systems. Unexpectedly, E. coli was lost from the GAC water-supplied network more rapidly than from the nanofiltered water-supplied network, perhaps because of the grazing activity of protozoa in GAC water but not in nanofiltered water. Thus, the GAC water-supplied network contained a functional ecosystem with well-established and structured microbial communities, while the nanofiltered water-supplied system did not. The presence of protozoa in drinking water distribution systems must not be neglected because these populations may regulate the autochthonous and allochthonous bacterial populations.
饮用水分配系统中细菌群落的发展会形成一条食物链,这条食物链会促进与水质要求和美观不相容的大型生物的生长。然而,很少有研究考察饮用水分配系统中的微生物群落及其营养关系。本研究旨在量化微生物群落(尤其是细菌和原生动物),并获得原生动物以两个配水网络中的细菌为食的直接和间接证据,其中一个网络供应颗粒活性炭过滤水(即经颗粒活性炭过滤的水),另一个供应纳滤水。供应纳滤水的网络在水相(平均每升5×10⁷个细菌细胞)或生物膜(平均每平方厘米7×10⁶个细菌细胞)中均未发现比细菌更大的生物。在整个供应纳滤水的网络(水加生物膜)中未检测到原生动物。相比之下,供应颗粒活性炭过滤水的网络含有细菌(水中平均每升3×10⁸个细胞,生物膜中平均每平方厘米4×10⁷个细胞)和原生动物(水中平均每升10⁵个细胞,生物膜中平均每平方厘米10³个细胞)。水中主要是鞭毛虫(93%)、纤毛虫(1.8%)、壳变形虫(1.6%)和裸变形虫(1.1%)。生物膜中只有纤毛虫(52%)和壳变形虫(48%)。在实验室测试中,只有供应颗粒活性炭过滤水的网络固液界面处的纤毛虫具有可测量的捕食活性(估计每只纤毛虫每小时捕食2个细菌)。通过向实验配水系统中添加大肠杆菌间接表明了原生动物对细菌的摄取。出乎意料的是,大肠杆菌在供应颗粒活性炭过滤水的网络中消失的速度比在供应纳滤水的网络中更快,这可能是因为颗粒活性炭过滤水中原生动物的捕食活性,而纳滤水中没有。因此,供应颗粒活性炭过滤水的网络包含一个功能完善、结构有序的微生物群落生态系统,而供应纳滤水的系统则没有。饮用水分配系统中原生动物的存在不容忽视,因为这些种群可能会调节本地和外来细菌种群。