Thimm B, Wundt W
Dev Biol Stand. 1976;31:201-17.
Brucellosis, as a geomedical literature survey has shown, is spread to a higher of lesser degree of incidence virtually over the whole African continent. Its epidemiological spectrum of host animals is especially rich amongst the domestic and wild animal species. All domestic animal species and 21 of 26 herbivorous and 5 of 12 carnivorous wild animal species screened yielded positive brucella antibody serotitres. Thus self-maintaining natural foci independent of the domestic stock have firmly been established. The mapping of the epidemiological situation must be based on survey data which should have been planned, exactly performed, analyzed and reported according to statistical rules. Unfortunately Africa is especially badly covered in the world literature in the field of brucellosis. Representing itself 32.0% (49/153) of the countries of the world, their Medical and Veterinary Departments contributed only 2.1% of the computerized world literature on brucellosis in the period 1969-74. This picture can be considerably changed by including the non-computerized "grey literature" of Department and Laboratory Annual Reports into the screening process. By introducing objective, mathematical criteria for determining the degree of incidence from the available data, the following results were obtained from the literature survey: brucellosis is known or suspected to exist in 40 of the 49 African countries (82%). In 20 (41%) of these countries it represents a major problem, in 10 (20.4%) a moderate problem in the other 10 countries a minor problem to human health and economy. Following the rule that brucellosis can be expected to exist everywhere in the world (with the exception of a few islands) where cattle, sheep and/or goats are kept unless it has been eliminated by vigourous measures of control, it may be expected that the remaining 9 African countries not yet reporting also harbour this chronic, zoonotic disease. 35 of the 40 countries reporting have found brucellosis regularly, 1 exceptionally among domestic animals, 5 among game animals. Only 17 of these 35 (48.5%) have scheduled the disease, even if its incidence has been reported to be high. Only 32 of the 49 countries report on human brucellosis. The main reservoirs of disease and risks of infection vary from place to place with the different main kinds of domestic stock, the animal husbandry and human consumption methods and habits. Thus mainly the cattle herds are the source of infection for those countries where large numbers of cattle are kept and the drinking of raw milk is the custom; however, there is no strict correlation between these two factors. Goats and sheep fill the epidemiological place in all those countries where the lack of marketable milk curtails its consumption; the small ruminants are kept as the main source of meat supply and in close contact with the farmers family within the compound or house.
正如一项地理医学文献调查所显示的,布鲁氏菌病在几乎整个非洲大陆都有不同程度的传播。其宿主动物的流行病学范围在 domestic 和野生动物物种中尤其丰富。在所有被筛查的家畜物种以及26种食草野生动物中的21种和12种食肉野生动物中的5种中,布鲁氏菌抗体血清滴度呈阳性。因此,独立于家畜种群的自我维持的自然疫源地已经牢固地建立起来。流行病学情况的测绘必须基于调查数据,这些数据应该按照统计规则进行规划、准确执行、分析和报告。不幸的是,非洲在布鲁氏菌病领域的世界文献中报道得尤其少。非洲国家占世界国家总数的32.0%(49/153),但其医学和兽医部门在1969 - 1974年期间仅贡献了布鲁氏菌病计算机化世界文献的2.1%。通过将部门和实验室年度报告中的非计算机化“灰色文献”纳入筛查过程,这种情况可能会有很大改变。通过引入客观的数学标准来根据现有数据确定发病率,文献调查得出了以下结果:在49个非洲国家中的40个(82%)已知或怀疑存在布鲁氏菌病。在其中20个(41%)国家,它是一个主要问题;在10个(20.4%)国家是一个中等问题;在另外10个国家对人类健康和经济是一个小问题。按照布鲁氏菌病在世界上所有饲养牛、羊和/或山羊的地方(少数岛屿除外)都可能存在的规则,除非通过有力的控制措施将其消灭,那么可以预期其余9个尚未报告的非洲国家也存在这种慢性人畜共患病。报告的40个国家中有35个经常发现布鲁氏菌病,其中1例在家畜中异常,5例在野生动物中。在这35个国家中,只有17个(48.5%)对该病进行了规划,即使据报道其发病率很高。49个国家中只有32个报告了人类布鲁氏菌病。疾病的主要储存宿主和感染风险因地区而异,取决于不同的主要家畜种类、畜牧业和人类消费方式及习惯。因此,在那些大量饲养牛且有饮用生奶习俗的国家,牛群主要是感染源;然而,这两个因素之间没有严格的相关性。在所有那些缺乏可销售牛奶从而减少牛奶消费的国家,山羊和绵羊在流行病学中占据相应位置;小型反刍动物被作为主要肉类供应来源饲养,并与农户家庭在院子或房屋内密切接触。