Hard cases make bad law?
作者信息
Brazier M
出版信息
J Med Ethics. 1997 Dec;23(6):341-3. doi: 10.1136/jme.23.6.341.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Hard cases make bad law?疑难案件出恶法？
J Med Ethics. 1997 Dec;23(6):341-3. doi: 10.1136/jme.23.6.341.
2
A unique case of frozen sperm export?冷冻精子出口的一个独特案例？
Lancet. 1997 Feb 15;349(9050):448. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)61180-4.
3
A role model of rigidity.僵化的典范。
Lancet. 1996 Nov 9;348(9037):1253.
4
R v Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. Ex parte Blood. 17 October 1996.R诉人类受精与胚胎学管理局。布罗德案（1996年10月17日）。
Health Care Anal. 1997 Jun;5(2):157-60.
5
6
Widow's fight for husband's sperm. Intervention by BMA's ethics committee was ill judged.寡妇为获取亡夫精子而斗争。英国医学协会伦理委员会的干预判断失当。
BMJ. 1996 Dec 7;313(7070):1477. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7070.1477.
7
More questions than answers? R v Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority ex parte Blood The Times 7th February 1997.问题比答案还多？女王诉人类受精与胚胎管理局案（Blood 诉） 1997年2月7日《泰晤士报》
Med Law Int. 1997;3(1):75-81. doi: 10.1177/096853329700300104.
8
Bending the statutory rules: the case of Mrs. Blood.违反法定规则：布拉德夫人案
Health Care Anal. 1997 Sep;5(3):238-240, 243. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1042(199709)5:3<237::aid-hca234>3.0.co;2-5.
9
10
Buy baby: the European Union and regulation of human reproduction.
Oxf J Leg Stud. 1998 Summer;18(2):207-33. doi: 10.1093/ojls/18.2.207.
引用本文的文献
1
Best interests and pragmatism.最大利益与务实态度。
Health Care Anal. 2008 Sep;16(3):208-18. doi: 10.1007/s10728-008-0089-5. Epub 2008 Aug 5.
2
A drunk driver, a sober pedestrian and the allocation of tragically scarce and indivisible emergency hospital treatment.一名醉酒司机、一名清醒的行人与极其稀缺且不可分割的急诊医院治疗资源分配
Health Care Anal. 1999;7(1):5-21. doi: 10.1023/A:1009452120162.
3
Consent to treatment and the mentally incapacitated adult.对治疗的同意与无行为能力的成年人。
J R Soc Med. 1999 Jun;92(6):290-2. doi: 10.1177/014107689909200606.
Zotero 插件