Farry S C, Henke S E, Beasom S L, Fearneyhough M G
Caesar Kleberg Wildlife Research Institute, Texas A&M University-Kingsville 78363, USA.
J Wildl Dis. 1998 Jan;34(1):23-32. doi: 10.7589/0090-3558-34.1.23.
This study sought to develop a baiting strategy to deliver an oral rabies vaccine to free-ranging coyotes (Canis latrans) in southern Texas. To determine bait longevity, dog foodlard baits were placed (n = 50) on- and off-roads during July 1994 and January 1995. Coyote visitation and uptake rates did not differ between on-road and off-road placement of baits. To evaluate bait stations as possible visual cues, baits were placed out both with (n = 50) and without (n = 50) bait stations. A visual cue of a bait station did not affect coyote response to baits. Bait longevity was shorter during July (< or = 4 days) than January because of consumption of baits by imported fire ants (Solenopsis invicta). The effect of two different bait densities on coyote acceptance rates was determined on six 93.5 km2 study areas in southern Texas. Three study areas received a bait density of 19 baits/km2 (50 baits/mi2) and the remaining three study areas received 58 baits/km2 (150 baits/mi2). Coyote bait uptake rates, based upon the proportion of coyotes marked with either tetracycline hydrochloride or rhodamine B or both, were 83% (n = 99 coyotes) and 87% (n = 101 coyotes) for the 19 and 58 baits/km2 densities, respectively. Bait uptake rates did not differ (P > 0.54) between the two bait densities. Rodents and rabbits, which were fed baits containing tetracycline hydrochloride and a simulated oral rabies vaccine sachet containing rhodamine B, did consume the bait but not the rhodamine B sachet. These animals then were killed and fed to captive coyotes (n = 9). Canine teeth were extracted from coyotes and processed for tetracycline determination. Each coyote tested negative for tetracycline. Therefore, it was unlikely that coyote bait consumption rates were overestimated because of coyotes secondarily marking themselves by ingesting prey items that consumed baits.
本研究旨在制定一种诱饵投放策略,以便向得克萨斯州南部自由放养的郊狼(犬属草原狼)投喂口服狂犬病疫苗。为确定诱饵的保存期限,1994年7月和1995年1月期间,在道路上和道路外放置了狗粮猪油诱饵(n = 50)。道路上和道路外放置的诱饵,郊狼的到访率和摄取率并无差异。为评估诱饵站作为可能的视觉线索的作用,分别在有(n = 50)和没有(n = 50)诱饵站的情况下放置诱饵。诱饵站的视觉线索并未影响郊狼对诱饵的反应。由于进口火蚁(红火蚁)会食用诱饵,7月期间诱饵的保存期限(≤4天)比1月短。在得克萨斯州南部的六个93.5平方公里的研究区域,确定了两种不同诱饵密度对郊狼接受率的影响。三个研究区域的诱饵密度为每平方公里19个诱饵(每平方英里50个诱饵),其余三个研究区域的诱饵密度为每平方公里58个诱饵(每平方英里150个诱饵)。基于用盐酸四环素或若丹明B或两者标记的郊狼比例,每平方公里19个诱饵和58个诱饵密度下的郊狼诱饵摄取率分别为83%(n = 99只郊狼)和87%(n = 101只郊狼)。两种诱饵密度下的诱饵摄取率并无差异(P > 0.54)。给啮齿动物和兔子投喂含有盐酸四环素的诱饵以及含有若丹明B的模拟口服狂犬病疫苗香囊,它们确实食用了诱饵,但没有食用若丹明B香囊。然后将这些动物杀死并喂给圈养的郊狼(n = 9)。从郊狼身上提取犬齿并进行处理以测定四环素。每只郊狼的四环素检测均为阴性。因此,不太可能因为郊狼通过摄取食用了诱饵的猎物而二次标记自己,从而高估了郊狼的诱饵消耗率。