Linhart Samuel B, Wlodkowski John C, Kavanaugh Darrell M, Motes-Kreimeyer Laurie, Montoney Andrew J, Chipman Richard B, Slate Dennis, Bigler Laura L, Fearneyhough Malcomb G
Southeastern Cooperative Wildlife Disease Study, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602, USA.
J Wildl Dis. 2002 Apr;38(2):363-77. doi: 10.7589/0090-3558-38.2.363.
Research was conducted during 1996-2000 to develop baits for delivering an oral rabies vaccine to raccoons (Procyon lotor) and coyotes (Canis latrans). A bait was sought that: (1) was attractive to the target species, (2) could be distributed by aircraft, (3) was as effective (or more so) than the currently used fish meal polymer bait, and (4) could be produced in large numbers by automated procedures and could be purchased by user groups at substantially lower cost. Ten field trials were conducted to document raccoons' bait flavor preferences, evaluate a new vaccine sachet bait coated with various attractants, and determine if the sachet bait would effectively deliver Raboral V-RG oral rabies vaccine (Merial Limited, Athens, Georgia, USA) to this species. Raccoons preferred fish and crustacean-based flavors over those derived from plant materials. Raccoon visits to tracking stations, frequency of bait removals, and percent of sachets discarded by this species that were emptied of placebo vaccine indicated efficacy of the new bait was equal or superior to the currently used fish meal polymer bait. A field trial conducted in fall 1998 compared aerially distributed vaccine-laden sachet and polymer baits and showed there was no difference between the percent of raccoons from the test and reference areas subsequently found positive for rabies antibody. Four bait trials to determine coyote response to sachet baits were conducted in 1997-98. The propensity for canids to gulp or bolt smaller food items is well known. Thus, a first trial involved offering fish-flavored sachet baits of different sizes to 30 captive coyotes to determine if smaller size baits were more frequently swallowed intact. Two field trials were also conducted in fall 1997 to determine if free-ranging coyotes discriminated among sachet baits coated with different attractants. Finally, Raboral V-RG-laden poultry-flavored sachet baits were aerially dropped and the percent of seropositive coyotes was compared with coyotes from surrounding areas where fish meal polymer vaccine baits had been distributed. Captive coyotes did not swallow sachet baits intact, regardless of size. Bait preference field trials indicated that coyotes preferred poultry, cheese/beef tallow, and fish-flavored sachet baits and that such baits were taken at the same rate as polymer baits. A sample of coyotes from the area baited with vaccine-laden sachet baits had a markedly higher (P = 0.01) seropositivity rate than coyotes from areas where vaccine was distributed in polymer baits. Sachet bait production could be facilitated by automated technology and sachet baits used either as an alternative vaccine delivery device or in combination with the fish meal polymer bait.
1996年至2000年期间开展了研究,旨在开发用于向浣熊(北美浣熊)和郊狼(犬属)投喂口服狂犬病疫苗的诱饵。人们寻找一种满足以下条件的诱饵:(1)对目标物种有吸引力;(2)可通过飞机进行投放;(3)与目前使用的鱼粉聚合物诱饵效果相同(或更佳);(4)能够通过自动化程序大量生产,且用户群体能够以更低的成本购买。开展了十次野外试验,以记录浣熊对诱饵味道的偏好,评估涂有各种引诱剂的新型疫苗香囊诱饵,并确定该香囊诱饵能否有效地向该物种投喂Raboral V-RG口服狂犬病疫苗(美国佐治亚州雅典市梅里亚有限公司生产)。浣熊更喜欢基于鱼类和甲壳类的味道,而非源自植物材料的味道。浣熊前往追踪站的次数、诱饵被拿走的频率,以及该物种丢弃的已清空安慰剂疫苗的香囊百分比表明,新型诱饵的效果与目前使用的鱼粉聚合物诱饵相当或更优。1998年秋季进行的一项野外试验比较了空中投放的装有疫苗的香囊诱饵和聚合物诱饵,结果显示,试验区域和参照区域后来检测出狂犬病抗体呈阳性的浣熊百分比没有差异。1997年至1998年进行了四次诱饵试验,以确定郊狼对香囊诱饵的反应。犬科动物有狼吞虎咽较小食物的习性,这是众所周知的。因此,第一次试验是向30只圈养的郊狼提供不同大小的鱼味香囊诱饵,以确定较小尺寸的诱饵是否更常被完整吞咽。1997年秋季还进行了两次野外试验,以确定自由放养的郊狼是否能区分涂有不同引诱剂的香囊诱饵。最后,空投了装有Raboral V-RG的家禽味香囊诱饵,并将血清反应阳性郊狼的百分比与周围已投放鱼粉聚合物疫苗诱饵地区的郊狼进行比较。圈养的郊狼无论诱饵大小,都不会完整吞咽香囊诱饵。诱饵偏好野外试验表明,郊狼更喜欢家禽味、奶酪/牛脂味和鱼味的香囊诱饵,且这些诱饵的被取食率与聚合物诱饵相同。与在投放聚合物诱饵疫苗地区的郊狼相比,在投放装有疫苗香囊诱饵地区采集的郊狼样本的血清阳性率显著更高(P = 0.01)。自动化技术有助于香囊诱饵的生产,香囊诱饵可作为替代疫苗投放装置使用,或与鱼粉聚合物诱饵结合使用。