• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

义齿黏附剂的体外评估:复合碳水化合物的潜在功效

In vitro evaluation of denture adhesives: possible efficacy of complex carbohydrates.

作者信息

DeVengencie J, Ng M C, Ford P, Iacopino A M

机构信息

Department of Restorative Sciences, Baylor University College of Dentistry, Dallas, Texas, USA.

出版信息

Int J Prosthodont. 1997 Jan-Feb;10(1):61-72.

PMID:9484072
Abstract

The ideal denture adhesive demonstrates a neutral or slightly basic pH, minimal toxicity to the oral mucosa, and satisfactory adhesive bond strength for 12 to 16 hours. Three brands of commercially available denture adhesives (Fixodent Fresh, Procter and Gamble, Cincinnati, OH; Super Poli Grip, Block Drug, Jersey City, NJ; and Super Wernet's, Block Drug, Jersey City, NJ), and a complex mannose carbohydrate (Acemannan, Carrington Laboratories, Irving, TX) were evaluated in vitro to determine significant differences in pH, cytotoxicity, and adhesive bond strength. Super Poli Grip and Super Wernet's remained above the critical pH for hydroxyapatite (pH 6.5) throughout the study, while Acemannan and Fixodent Fresh did not. Fixodent Fresh exhibited significant cytotoxicity to human gingival fibroblasts. Acemannan demonstrated significantly greater overall mean adhesive bond strength in both dry and simulated oral conditions. The generally favorable in vitro performance of the Acemannan material compared to commercially available denture adhesive formulations indicates that complex carbohydrates may be efficacious denture adhesives.

摘要

理想的义齿黏附剂应具有中性或略呈碱性的pH值,对口腔黏膜的毒性最小,且在12至16小时内具有令人满意的黏附强度。对三种市售义齿黏附剂品牌(固齿健清新型,宝洁公司,俄亥俄州辛辛那提市;超强固齿乐,布洛克制药公司,新泽西州泽西城;以及超级韦内特,布洛克制药公司,新泽西州泽西城)和一种复合甘露糖碳水化合物(乙酰甘露聚糖,卡灵顿实验室,得克萨斯州欧文市)进行了体外评估,以确定它们在pH值、细胞毒性和黏附强度方面的显著差异。在整个研究过程中,超强固齿乐和超级韦内特的pH值始终高于羟基磷灰石的临界pH值(pH 6.5),而乙酰甘露聚糖和固齿健清新型则没有。固齿健清新型对人牙龈成纤维细胞表现出显著的细胞毒性。在干燥和模拟口腔条件下,乙酰甘露聚糖的总体平均黏附强度均显著更高。与市售义齿黏附剂配方相比,乙酰甘露聚糖材料总体上良好的体外性能表明,复合碳水化合物可能是有效的义齿黏附剂。

相似文献

1
In vitro evaluation of denture adhesives: possible efficacy of complex carbohydrates.义齿黏附剂的体外评估:复合碳水化合物的潜在功效
Int J Prosthodont. 1997 Jan-Feb;10(1):61-72.
2
In vitro evaluation of complex carbohydrate denture adhesive formulations.复合碳水化合物假牙粘合剂配方的体外评估
Quintessence Int. 1998 Sep;29(9):585-93.
3
A method for testing denture adhesives.一种测试假牙粘合剂的方法。
J Prosthet Dent. 1995 May;73(5):486-91. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(05)80080-0.
4
In vitro comparison of the tensile bond strength of denture adhesives on denture bases.义齿基托上义齿粘合剂拉伸粘结强度的体外比较
J Prosthet Dent. 2013 Dec;110(6):488-93. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.09.014. Epub 2013 Oct 28.
5
In vitro cytotoxicity evaluation of denture adhesive.义齿黏附剂的体外细胞毒性评价
Chin J Dent Res. 2000 Dec;3(4):59-62.
6
Laboratory evaluation of a new denture adhesive.一种新型假牙粘合剂的实验室评估。
Dent Mater. 2004 Jun;20(5):419-24. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2002.12.001.
7
Cytotoxic effects of denture adhesives on primary human oral keratinocytes, fibroblasts and permanent L929 cell lines.义齿黏附剂对原代人口腔角质形成细胞、成纤维细胞和永生L929细胞系的细胞毒性作用。
Gerodontology. 2014 Mar;31(1):4-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-2358.2012.00681.x. Epub 2012 May 21.
8
A method for testing denture adhesives.一种测试假牙粘合剂的方法。
J Prosthet Dent. 1991 Oct;66(4):501-4. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(91)90512-u.
9
[Development and property test of synthetic macromolecular resin class of comfort denture adhesive].[合成高分子树脂类舒适型义齿黏附剂的研制与性能测试]
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2002 Mar;37(2):150-2.
10
Are Denture Adhesives Safe for Oral Cells?义齿黏合剂对口腔细胞安全吗?
J Prosthodont. 2021 Jan;30(1):65-70. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13226. Epub 2020 Jul 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of silver vanadate on the antibiofilm, adhesion and biocompatibility properties of denture adhesive.银钒酸对义齿胶抗菌膜、黏附性和生物相容性的影响。
Future Microbiol. 2024;19(8):655-665. doi: 10.2217/fmb-2023-0227. Epub 2024 May 3.
2
The Effect of Herbal Denture Adhesive on Patient Satisfaction in Comparison to Traditional Type.与传统类型相比,草药假牙粘合剂对患者满意度的影响。
Cureus. 2023 Sep 26;15(9):e46001. doi: 10.7759/cureus.46001. eCollection 2023 Sep.
3
Comparison of primary human gingival fibroblasts from an older and a young donor on the evaluation of cytotoxicity of denture adhesives.
比较来自老年和年轻供体的原代人牙龈成纤维细胞对义齿粘合剂细胞毒性的评估。
J Appl Oral Sci. 2018;26:e20160594. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2016-0594. Epub 2018 Feb 22.
4
A clinical evaluation denture adhesives used by patients with xerostomia.对口干患者使用的义齿黏附剂的临床评估。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Feb;94(7):e545. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000545.
5
Antimicrobial efficacy of denture adhesives on some oral malodor-related microbes.义齿黏附剂对一些口腔异味相关微生物的抗菌效果。
Odontology. 2013 Jan;101(1):103-7. doi: 10.1007/s10266-011-0048-8. Epub 2011 Nov 11.
6
Cytotoxicity of denture adhesives.义齿黏附剂的细胞毒性。
Clin Oral Investig. 2011 Dec;15(6):885-93. doi: 10.1007/s00784-010-0464-0. Epub 2010 Sep 16.