Okada K, Okada S, Nishitani K
Department of Anesthesia, Center for Adult Disease, Kurashiki.
Masui. 1998 Jan;47(1):64-8.
Combined spinal-epidural anesthesia is a useful technique. However, there has been no attempt to investigate the risk of epidural opioid, especially buprenorphine, flux through the dural hole. The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of epidural buprenorphine administered across the dura into subarachnoid space, between two different methods of administration; bolus injection (Group I) and continuous infusion (Group II). Sixty patients for transvaginal hysterectomy were divided into two groups. Group I received buprenorphine 0.1-0.2 mg with 0.25% bupivacaine, and Group II 0.4 mg with 0.25% bupivacaine 40 ml continuously (infusion rate was 1.7 ml.h-1). Pain relief was similar in both groups, but the total buprenorphine requirement was lower in Group I than in Group II. The incidence of nausea and vomiting was significantly higher in Group I than that in Group II, 73% and 16%, respectively. It indicates that the increase of nausea and vomiting is predominantly determined by a high rate of flux into subarachnoid space and only partly determined by blood concentrations. In contrast to continuous infusion, the drug movement through the dural hole may increase by bolus injection due to its higher pressure. We recommend careful injection of epidural buprenorphine such as by continuous infusion with low pressure after combined spinal-epidural anesthesia.
腰麻-硬膜外联合麻醉是一种有用的技术。然而,尚未有人尝试研究硬膜外使用阿片类药物,尤其是丁丙诺啡通过硬脊膜孔进入蛛网膜下腔的风险。本研究的目的是比较硬膜外给予丁丙诺啡通过硬脊膜进入蛛网膜下腔,在两种不同给药方法(单次注射(I组)和持续输注(II组))之间的效果。60例行经阴道子宫切除术的患者被分为两组。I组接受0.1 - 0.2 mg丁丙诺啡与0.25%布比卡因混合液,II组接受0.4 mg丁丙诺啡与40 ml 0.25%布比卡因持续混合液(输注速率为1.7 ml·h-1)。两组的镇痛效果相似,但I组丁丙诺啡的总需求量低于II组。I组恶心呕吐的发生率显著高于II组,分别为73%和16%。这表明恶心呕吐的增加主要由进入蛛网膜下腔的高流量决定,仅部分由血药浓度决定。与持续输注相比,单次注射由于压力较高可能会增加药物通过硬脊膜孔的移动。我们建议在腰麻-硬膜外联合麻醉后,如通过低压持续输注的方式谨慎注射硬膜外丁丙诺啡。