Leuthold H, Sommer W
Department of Biological Psychology/Psychophysiology, Humboldt-University of Berlin, Germany.
Psychophysiology. 1998 Jan;35(1):34-46.
P300 latency is commonly thought to provide a chronometric index of the duration of perceptual processing. Because the evidence in favor of this assumption is controversial, we examined whether P300 latency is influenced by perceptual processes, response selection, and by motoric processes in two experiments using a two-choice spatial stimulus-response compatibility (SRC) task. Both experiments revealed additive effects of perceptual difficulty with spatial SRC in reaction time and P300 latency. In addition, Experiment 2 showed that P300 latency measured in average waveforms is insensitive to motoric processes. The influence of spatial SRC on P300 latency disagrees with the view that P300 latency is sensitive only to stimulus evaluation processes. However, P300 latency may be used to discriminate between influences on premotoric and motoric processing stages. A response conflict account for the SRC effect on P300 latency is suggested.
P300潜伏期通常被认为是提供感知处理持续时间的计时指标。由于支持这一假设的证据存在争议,我们在两个实验中使用二选一空间刺激-反应相容性(SRC)任务,研究了P300潜伏期是否受感知过程、反应选择和运动过程的影响。两个实验均揭示了感知难度与空间SRC在反应时间和P300潜伏期方面的累加效应。此外,实验2表明,平均波形中测量的P300潜伏期对运动过程不敏感。空间SRC对P300潜伏期的影响与P300潜伏期仅对刺激评估过程敏感的观点不一致。然而,P300潜伏期可用于区分对运动前和运动处理阶段的影响。我们提出了一个反应冲突解释SRC对P300潜伏期的影响。