Scholte R H, van Aken M A, van Lieshout C F
Department of Developmental Psychology, University of Nijmegen.
J Pers Assess. 1997 Dec;69(3):534-54. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6903_8.
In this study, the robustness of the Big Five personality factors in adolescents' self-ratings and peer nominations was investigated. Data were obtained on 2,001 adolescents attending secondary school (885 girls; 1,116 boys; M age = 14.5 years). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses on the self-ratings confirmed the Big Five personality factors. In contrast, exploratory analysis on the peer nominations revealed five different factors: Aggression-Inattentiveness, Achievement-Withdrawal, Self-Confidence, Sociability, and Emotionality-Nervousness. It is suggested that peers evaluate group members not in terms of their personality but in terms of their group reputation. Peer evaluations contributed substantially to the prediction of peer acceptance and rejection; the Big Five personality factors based on self-ratings did not.
在本研究中，调查了青少年自评和同伴提名中“大五”人格因素的稳健性。研究获得了2001名中学生（885名女生；1116名男生；平均年龄 = 14.5岁）的数据。对自评进行的探索性和验证性因素分析证实了“大五”人格因素。相比之下，对同伴提名的探索性分析揭示了五个不同的因素：攻击性 - 注意力不集中、成就 - 退缩、自信、社交性和情绪性 - 紧张。研究表明，同伴评估小组成员不是基于其个性，而是基于其在小组中的声誉。同伴评价对同伴接纳和排斥的预测有很大贡献；基于自评的“大五”人格因素则不然。
