• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胰腺癌患者腹腔神经丛阻滞的前瞻性随机双盲试验

Prospective randomized double-blind trial of neurolytic coeliac plexus block in patients with pancreatic cancer.

作者信息

Polati E, Finco G, Gottin L, Bassi C, Pederzoli P, Ischia S

机构信息

Institute of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Verona, Italy.

出版信息

Br J Surg. 1998 Feb;85(2):199-201. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00563.x.

DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00563.x
PMID:9501815
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In a randomized double-blind study the efficacy of neurolytic coeliac plexus block (NCPB) was compared with pharmacological therapy in the treatment of pain from pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

Twenty-four patients were divided into two groups: 12 patients underwent NCPB (group 1) and 12 were treated with pharmacological therapy (group 2). Immediate and long-term efficacy, mean analgesic consumption, mortality and morbidity were evaluated at follow-up. Statistical analysis was performed with the unpaired t test, Mann-Whitney U test and Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

Immediately after the block, patients in group 1 reported significant pain relief compared with those in group 2 (P < 0.05), but long-term results did not differ between the groups. Mean analgesic consumption was lower in group 1. There were no deaths. Complications related to NCPB were transient diarrhoea and hypotension (P not significant between groups). Drug-related adverse effects were constipation (five of 12 patients in group 1 versus 12 of 12 in group 2), nausea and/or vomiting (four of 12 patients in group 1 versus 12 of 12 in group 2) (P < 0.05), one gastric ulcer and one gluteal abscess in group 2.

CONCLUSION

NCPB was associated with a reduction in analgesic drug administration and drug-related adverse effects, representing an effective tool in the treatment of pancreatic cancer pain.

摘要

背景

在一项随机双盲研究中,比较了腹腔神经丛阻滞(NCPB)与药物治疗在胰腺癌疼痛治疗中的疗效。

方法

24例患者分为两组:12例接受NCPB治疗(第1组),12例接受药物治疗(第2组)。随访时评估即刻和长期疗效、平均镇痛药消耗量、死亡率和发病率。采用非配对t检验、曼-惠特尼U检验和费舍尔精确检验进行统计学分析。

结果

阻滞术后即刻,第1组患者的疼痛缓解程度明显高于第2组(P<0.05),但两组的长期结果无差异。第1组的平均镇痛药消耗量较低。无死亡病例。与NCPB相关的并发症为短暂性腹泻和低血压(两组间P无显著性差异)。与药物相关的不良反应为便秘(第1组12例患者中有5例,第2组12例患者中有12例)、恶心和/或呕吐(第1组12例患者中有4例,第2组12例患者中有12例)(P<0.05),第2组有1例胃溃疡和1例臀肌脓肿。

结论

NCPB与镇痛药给药量减少及药物相关不良反应减少相关,是治疗胰腺癌疼痛的有效手段。

相似文献

1
Prospective randomized double-blind trial of neurolytic coeliac plexus block in patients with pancreatic cancer.胰腺癌患者腹腔神经丛阻滞的前瞻性随机双盲试验
Br J Surg. 1998 Feb;85(2):199-201. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00563.x.
2
The effects of early or late neurolytic sympathetic plexus block on the management of abdominal or pelvic cancer pain.早期或晚期神经溶解性交感神经丛阻滞对腹部或盆腔癌痛管理的影响。
Pain. 2004 Jul;110(1-2):400-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2004.04.023.
3
A comparison of two invasive techniques in the management of intractable pain due to inoperable pancreatic cancer: neurolytic celiac plexus block and videothoracoscopic splanchnicectomy.两种侵入性技术用于治疗无法手术的胰腺癌所致顽固性疼痛的比较:腹腔神经丛阻滞和电视胸腔镜内脏神经切除术。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2005 Sep;31(7):768-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2005.03.012.
4
A comparison of intraoperative celiac plexus block with pharmacological therapy as a treatment for pain of unresectable pancreatic cancer.术中腹腔神经丛阻滞与药物治疗作为不可切除胰腺癌疼痛治疗方法的比较。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2002;9(3):372-5. doi: 10.1007/s005340200042.
5
Efficacy of coeliac plexus and splanchnic nerve blockades in body and tail located pancreatic cancer pain.腹腔神经丛和内脏神经阻滞对胰体尾癌疼痛的疗效。
Eur J Pain. 2004 Dec;8(6):539-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2004.01.001.
6
[Intraoperative neurolysis of the celiac plexus in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer].[不可切除胰腺癌患者腹腔神经丛的术中神经松解术]
Zentralbl Chir. 2003 May;128(5):419-23. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-40039.
7
Neurolytic celiac plexus block: a better alternative to opioid treatment in upper abdominal malignancies: an Indian experience.腹腔神经丛阻滞术:上腹部恶性肿瘤中比阿片类药物治疗更好的选择:印度经验
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2005;19(3):15-20.
8
Neurolytic celiac plexus block for pancreatic cancer pain.用于胰腺癌疼痛的腹腔神经丛毁损术
Anesth Analg. 1987 Sep;66(9):869-73.
9
Effects of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with buprenorphine and morphine alone and in combination during the first 12 postoperative hours: a randomized, double-blind, four-arm trial in adults undergoing abdominal surgery.术后12小时内单独及联合使用丁丙诺啡和吗啡静脉自控镇痛的效果:一项针对接受腹部手术的成年人的随机、双盲、四臂试验。
Clin Ther. 2009 Mar;31(3):527-41. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.03.018.
10
Assessment of consecutive neurolytic celiac plexus block (NCPB) technique outcomes in the management of refractory visceral cancer pain.连续腹腔神经丛阻滞(NCPB)技术治疗难治性内脏癌痛的评估。
Pain Med. 2012 Apr;13(4):518-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2012.01332.x. Epub 2012 Feb 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Minimally invasive techniques versus opioids in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.不可切除胰腺癌患者的微创技术与阿片类药物:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025 Jul 9;10:45. doi: 10.21037/tgh-24-141. eCollection 2025.
2
Interventional Therapies to Treat Cancer Associated Pain.治疗癌症相关疼痛的介入疗法。
Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2025 Jun 27. doi: 10.1007/s11864-025-01337-1.
3
16. Pain in chronic pancreatitis.16. 慢性胰腺炎中的疼痛。
Pain Pract. 2025 Apr;25(4):e70030. doi: 10.1111/papr.70030.
4
Sympathetic nerve blocks for persistent pain in adults with inoperable abdominopelvic cancer.成人无法手术的腹盆腔癌症持续性疼痛的交感神经阻滞。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 6;6(6):CD015229. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015229.pub2.
5
Long-Term Analgesic Efficacy of Neurolytic Splanchnic Nerve Block via the Transintervertebral Disc Approach to Retrocrural Space: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.经椎间盘入路至膈脚后间隙的内脏神经溶解阻滞的长期镇痛疗效:一项多中心回顾性研究
Pain Ther. 2023 Jun;12(3):825-840. doi: 10.1007/s40122-023-00506-0. Epub 2023 Apr 13.
6
Factors associated with successful response to neurolytic celiac plexus block in patients with upper abdominal cancer-related pain: a retrospective study.上腹部癌症相关疼痛患者对腹腔神经丛阻滞成功应答的相关因素:一项回顾性研究
Korean J Pain. 2021 Oct 1;34(4):479-486. doi: 10.3344/kjp.2021.34.4.479.
7
Indian Society for Study of Pain, Cancer Pain Special Interest Group Guidelines on Interventional Management for Cancer Pain.印度疼痛研究协会癌症疼痛特别兴趣小组癌症疼痛介入管理指南
Indian J Palliat Care. 2020 Apr-Jun;26(2):203-209. doi: 10.4103/0973-1075.285696.
8
Pain Control with Splanchnic Neurolysis in Pancreatic Cancer Patients Unresponsive to Celiac Plexus Neurolysis.内脏神经溶解术用于对腹腔神经丛神经溶解术无反应的胰腺癌患者的疼痛控制
J Pain Res. 2020 Aug 12;13:2023-2031. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S266689. eCollection 2020.
9
Pain Intervention for Cancer and Non-cancer Pain: A Retrospective Analysis of Tertiary Care Hospital Experience.癌症疼痛与非癌症疼痛的疼痛干预:三级护理医院经验的回顾性分析
Cureus. 2020 Apr 18;12(4):e7719. doi: 10.7759/cureus.7719.
10
Population-based study of the prevalence and management of self-reported high pain scores in patients with non-resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma.基于人群的研究:未切除胰腺腺癌患者自述高疼痛评分的患病率和管理。
Br J Surg. 2019 Nov;106(12):1666-1675. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11330.