Wasser J S, Guthrie S S, Chari M
Department of Veterinary Physiology and Pharmacology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Texas A&M University, College Station 77843-4466, USA.
Comp Biochem Physiol A Physiol. 1997 Dec;118(4):1359-70. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9629(97)00248-x.
Although freshwater turtles as a group are highly anoxia tolerant, dramatic interspecific differences in the degree of anoxia tolerance have been demonstrated in vivo. Painted turtles (Chrysemys picta bellii) appear to be the most hypoxia-tolerant species thus far studied, while softshelled turtles (Trionyx spinifer) are the most hypoxia-sensitive. We have assumed that this dichotomy persists in vitro but have not, until now, directly tested this assumption. We therefore, directly compared the responses of isolated, perfused, working hearts from these two species to either 240 min of anoxia, 90 min of global ischemia, or 240 min of global ischemia followed by reoxygenation/reperfusion. Isolated hearts were perfused at 20 degrees C and monitored continuously for phosphocreatine (PCr), adenosine triphosphate (ATP), inorganic phosphate (Pi), and intracellular pH (pHi) by 31P-nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy as well as for ventricular developed pressure and heart rate. Contrary to our expectations, we observed few significant differences in any of these parameters between painted and softshelled turtle hearts. Hearts from both species tolerated 240 min of anoxia equally well and both restored PCr, pHi, and Pi contents to control levels during reoxygenation. We did observe some significant interspecific differences in the 90 min (pHi and Pi) and 240 min (PCr) ischemia protocols although these seemed to suggest that Trionyx hearts might be more tolerant to these stresses than Chrysemys hearts. We conclude that: (a) the observed in vivo differences in anoxia tolerance between painted and softshelled turtles must either be due to differences in organ metabolism in organs other than the heart (e.g., brain) or to some integrative physiologic differences between the species; and (b) isolated hearts from a species known to be relatively anoxia sensitive in vivo can exhibit an apparent high degree of anoxia and ischemia tolerance in vitro.
尽管淡水龟作为一个群体对缺氧具有高度耐受性,但体内实验已证明不同种类的淡水龟在缺氧耐受程度上存在显著差异。锦龟(Chrysemys picta bellii)似乎是迄今为止研究的最耐缺氧的物种,而鳖(Trionyx spinifer)则是对缺氧最敏感的。我们曾假定这种二分法在体外也存在,但直到现在都没有直接验证这一假设。因此,我们直接比较了这两个物种离体、灌注、工作状态的心脏在经历240分钟缺氧、90分钟全心缺血或240分钟全心缺血后再给氧/再灌注时的反应。离体心脏在20℃下进行灌注,并通过31P-核磁共振波谱法连续监测磷酸肌酸(PCr)、三磷酸腺苷(ATP)、无机磷酸盐(Pi)和细胞内pH(pHi),同时监测心室舒张末压和心率。与我们的预期相反,我们观察到锦龟和鳖的心脏在这些参数上几乎没有显著差异。两个物种的心脏对240分钟缺氧的耐受性同样良好,并且在再给氧过程中都将PCr、pHi和Pi含量恢复到了对照水平。在90分钟(pHi和Pi)和240分钟(PCr)缺血方案中,我们确实观察到了一些显著的种间差异,尽管这些差异似乎表明鳖的心脏可能比锦龟的心脏对这些应激更具耐受性。我们得出以下结论:(a)观察到的锦龟和鳖在体内缺氧耐受性的差异,要么是由于心脏以外的器官(如大脑)代谢差异,要么是由于物种间某些综合生理差异;(b)在体内已知对缺氧相对敏感的物种的离体心脏在体外可表现出明显的高度缺氧和缺血耐受性。