Suppr超能文献

采用交叉标准化方法评估肺炎球菌多糖参考血清89SF中先前指定的抗体浓度。

Evaluation of previously assigned antibody concentrations in pneumococcal polysaccharide reference serum 89SF by the method of cross-standardization.

作者信息

Concepcion N, Frasch C E

机构信息

Division of Bacterial Products, Center for Biological Evaluation and Research, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 1998 Mar;5(2):199-204. doi: 10.1128/CDLI.5.2.199-204.1998.

Abstract

An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and the antibody concentrations assigned to different pneumococcal capsular polysaccharide types were used to estimate concentrations of antibody to additional pneumococcal types in reference serum 89SF and to confirm assigned antibody values. This was possible because the slopes of curves of antibody binding to all polysaccharide types evaluated (1, 3, 4, 5, 6B, 7F, 9V, 14, 18C, 19F, and 23F) were similar. The point estimates for total anti-pneumococcal antibody and immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody determined by cross-standardization by an ELISA based on use of methylated human serum albumin (mHSA) to improve the efficiency of polysaccharide binding to the ELISA plate differed by less than 40% from those reported by Quataert et al. (Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol. 2:590-597, 1995) for types 1, 4, 6B, 7F, 9V, 14, 18C, and 23F. However, large differences were found between the assigned values and those obtained by our mHSA ELISA for types 3 and 19F. The mHSA ELISA and the direct polysaccharide coat ELISA may not measure antibodies to the same epitopes on polysaccharides of types 3 and 19F. The functional importance of these different antibody specificities is being investigated. We have thus confirmed the assigned IgG antibody values for most types by a different method and have extended antibody assignments to several additional types.

摘要

采用酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)以及针对不同肺炎球菌荚膜多糖类型所确定的抗体浓度,来估算参考血清89SF中针对其他肺炎球菌类型的抗体浓度,并确认所确定的抗体值。这之所以可行,是因为评估的所有多糖类型(1、3、4、5、6B、7F、9V、14、18C、19F和23F)的抗体结合曲线斜率相似。基于使用甲基化人血清白蛋白(mHSA)以提高多糖与ELISA板结合效率的ELISA法,通过交叉标准化确定的总抗肺炎球菌抗体和免疫球蛋白G(IgG)抗体的点估计值,与Quataert等人(《临床诊断实验室免疫学》2:590 - 597,1995年)报道的1、4、6B、7F、9V、14、18C和23F型的点估计值相差不到40%。然而,对于3型和19F型,所确定的值与我们的mHSA ELISA法所获得的值之间存在很大差异。mHSA ELISA法和直接多糖包被ELISA法可能无法检测3型和19F型多糖上相同表位的抗体。正在研究这些不同抗体特异性的功能重要性。因此,我们已通过不同方法确认了大多数类型的IgG抗体值,并将抗体确定范围扩展到了几种其他类型。

相似文献

9
Establishment of a new human pneumococcal standard reference serum, 007sp.新型人肺炎球菌标准参考血清007sp的建立
Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2011 Oct;18(10):1728-36. doi: 10.1128/CVI.05252-11. Epub 2011 Aug 18.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验