Nahm M H, Siber G R, Olander J V
Washington University School of Medicine, Division of Laboratory Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA.
J Infect Dis. 1996 Jan;173(1):113-8. doi: 10.1093/infdis/173.1.113.
In an attempt to develop an assay specific for antibody to capsular polysaccharide (PS) of Streptococcus pneumoniae, the ability of ELISA and Farr (radioactive antigen-binding) assay for antibodies to 6B and 19A PS to be affected by antibodies to C-polysaccharide (C-PS) was compared. Preabsorption with C-PS reduced values obtained by ELISA for anti-6B antibody by > 3-fold in 5 of 10 preimmune and 7 of 26 postimmune sera. In contrast, absorption reduced values by > 3-fold in 0 of 36 samples studied with the Farr assay. Similar results were observed when the absorption was done with CSR-SCS2 S. pneumoniae. Furthermore, when anti-19A antibody levels were examined, preabsorption with R36a S. pneumoniae reduced ELISA values by 3-fold in 7 of 22 samples, whereas no samples had 3-fold reduction by Farr assay. Thus, the Farr assay for capsular PS is less affected than the ELISA by anti-C-PS antibody.
为了开发一种针对肺炎链球菌荚膜多糖(PS)抗体的特异性检测方法,比较了酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)和法尔(放射性抗原结合)测定法检测6B和19A PS抗体时受C多糖(C-PS)抗体影响的情况。用C-PS预吸收后,10份免疫前血清中的5份和26份免疫后血清中的7份,ELISA检测抗6B抗体得到的值降低了3倍以上。相比之下,在用法尔测定法研究的36份样本中,0份样本的吸收值降低了3倍以上。用肺炎链球菌CSR-SCS2进行吸收时也观察到类似结果。此外,在检测抗19A抗体水平时,用肺炎链球菌R36a预吸收后,22份样本中的7份ELISA值降低了3倍,而用法尔测定法没有样本的吸收值降低3倍。因此,针对荚膜PS的法尔测定法比ELISA受抗C-PS抗体的影响更小。