• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

控制错觉、低估与准确性:一种控制启发式解释

Illusions of control, underestimations, and accuracy: a control heuristic explanation.

作者信息

Thompson S C, Armstrong W, Thomas C

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Pomona College, Claremont, California 91711, USA.

出版信息

Psychol Bull. 1998 Mar;123(2):143-61. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.123.2.143.

DOI:10.1037/0033-2909.123.2.143
PMID:9522682
Abstract

The illusions of control area is reviewed, and 5 conditions that influence control judgments are identified: skill-related factors, success or failure emphasis, need for the outcome, mood, and the intrusion of reality. It is proposed that individuals use a control heuristic that includes perceptions of intentionality and connection. Judgments of intentionality are based on foreseeability, ability to produce the effect, and valence of the outcome. Judgments of connection are based on the perceived association between the action and the outcome, which includes temporal, shared meaning, and predictive association. Effects of motives to overestimate, underestimate, and have accurate assessments of control are explained, using the concepts of hindsight bias, connection, and counterfactuals. In addition, the relation between the control heuristic and illusory correlation research and applications of the control heuristic to coping with chronic illness are explored.

摘要

本文回顾了控制感错觉领域的研究,并确定了影响控制判断的5个条件:与技能相关的因素、对成功或失败的强调、对结果的需求、情绪以及现实的干扰。研究提出,个体使用一种控制启发式方法,其中包括对意向性和关联性的认知。意向性判断基于可预测性、产生效果的能力以及结果的效价。关联性判断基于行动与结果之间的感知关联,这包括时间关联、共同意义和预测性关联。利用后见之明偏差、关联性和反事实等概念,解释了高估、低估和准确评估控制感的动机所产生的影响。此外,还探讨了控制启发式方法与错觉相关研究之间的关系,以及控制启发式方法在应对慢性病方面的应用。

相似文献

1
Illusions of control, underestimations, and accuracy: a control heuristic explanation.控制错觉、低估与准确性:一种控制启发式解释
Psychol Bull. 1998 Mar;123(2):143-61. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.123.2.143.
2
Increased or reversed? The effect of surprise on hindsight bias depends on the hindsight component.增加还是反转?惊讶对后视偏差的影响取决于后视成分。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 Nov;35(6):1539-44. doi: 10.1037/a0017006.
3
The Optimistic Bias and Illusions of Control in Clinical Research.临床研究中的乐观偏差与控制错觉
IRB. 2016 Mar-Apr;38(2):8-14.
4
Persistence of repeated self-reported illusion of control as a product of action and outcome association in productive and preventive scenarios.在生产性和预防性场景中,反复自我报告的控制错觉的持续存在是行为和结果关联的产物。
Psychol Res. 2020 Jul;84(5):1184-1197. doi: 10.1007/s00426-019-01147-9. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
5
Illusory intuitive inferences: Matching heuristics explain logical intuitions.虚幻的直觉推理:匹配启发式解释逻辑直觉。
Cognition. 2023 Jun;235:105417. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105417. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
6
Association of need for cognition with judgments of height, weight, and body fat covariation.认知需求与身高、体重及体脂协变判断之间的关联。
Psychol Rep. 2000 Dec;87(3 Pt 2):1147-57. doi: 10.2466/pr0.2000.87.3f.1147.
7
The self-attribution bias and paranormal beliefs.自我归因偏差与超自然信念。
Conscious Cogn. 2017 Mar;49:313-321. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2017.02.001. Epub 2017 Feb 23.
8
Through the eyes of love: reality and illusion in intimate relationships.透过爱的视角:亲密关系中的现实与幻象。
Psychol Bull. 2010 Jul;136(4):627-58. doi: 10.1037/a0019792.
9
Causal illusions in children when the outcome is frequent.当结果频繁出现时儿童的因果错觉。
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 12;12(9):e0184707. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184707. eCollection 2017.
10
"If only…": when counterfactual thoughts can reduce illusions of personal authorship.“要是……就好了”:当反事实思维可以减少个人错觉时。
Conscious Cogn. 2012 Mar;21(1):456-63. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2011.11.008. Epub 2011 Dec 15.

引用本文的文献

1
People calibrate future expectations to past performance when predicting transparently random events.当预测明显随机的事件时,人们会根据过去的表现来校准对未来的期望。
PNAS Nexus. 2025 Aug 26;4(8):pgaf237. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf237. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Illusion of control and passion mediate the relationship between winning exposure and problem lottery gambling in a multigroup analysis.在一项多组分析中,控制错觉和激情介导了获胜曝光与问题彩票赌博之间的关系。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):20636. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-04045-w.
3
Does gambling preference level affect occupational fraud behavior?-Evidence from a survey study in China.
赌博偏好程度是否会影响职业欺诈行为?——来自中国一项调查研究的证据
Front Psychol. 2025 Feb 6;16:1494990. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1494990. eCollection 2025.
4
Exploring the influence of self-identification on perceptual judgments of physical and social causality.探索自我认同对物理和社会因果关系感知判断的影响。
PeerJ. 2024 May 21;12:e17449. doi: 10.7717/peerj.17449. eCollection 2024.
5
A Double-Edged-Sword Effect of Overplacement: Social Comparison Bias Predicts Gambling Motivations and Behaviors in Chinese Casino Gamblers.过度替代的双刃剑效应:社会比较偏差预测中国赌场赌客的赌博动机和行为。
J Gambl Stud. 2024 Sep;40(3):1-20. doi: 10.1007/s10899-024-10293-8. Epub 2024 Apr 9.
6
Healthcare workers' infection risk perceptions of aerosol-generating procedures and affective response.医护人员对产生气溶胶操作的感染风险认知及情感反应。
Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2023 Feb 15;3(1):e29. doi: 10.1017/ash.2022.276. eCollection 2023.
7
Predicting Risky Decision Making (Odds Selection) in Regular Soccer Gamblers from Nigeria using Cognitive Tasks Combined with Non-Cognitive Measures.使用认知任务与非认知测量相结合预测尼日利亚常规足球博彩者的高风险决策(赔率选择)。
J Gambl Stud. 2023 Mar;39(1):103-117. doi: 10.1007/s10899-022-10159-x. Epub 2022 Sep 24.
8
A Revised Framework for the Investigation of Expectation Update Versus Maintenance in the Context of Expectation Violations: The ViolEx 2.0 Model.期望违背情境下期望更新与维持的调查修订框架:ViolEx 2.0模型
Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 11;12:726432. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.726432. eCollection 2021.
9
Choosing increases the value of non-instrumental information.选择会增加非工具性信息的价值。
Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 22;11(1):8780. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-88031-y.
10
Suppress Me if You Can: Neurofeedback of the Readiness Potential.如果你能,请抑制我:准备电位的神经反馈。
eNeuro. 2021 Mar 9;8(2). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0425-20.2020. Print 2021 Mar-Apr.