Suppr超能文献

莫尔斯比港总医院对腹泻儿童摄入基于葡萄糖与基于大米的口服补液溶液进行的3小时定量比较。

A 3-hour quantitative comparison of glucose-based versus rice-based oral rehydration solution intake by children with diarrhoea in Port Moresby General Hospital.

作者信息

Wall C, Todaro W, Edwards K, Cleghorn G

机构信息

Children's Nutrition Research Centre, Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Brisbane, Australia.

出版信息

P N G Med J. 1995 Dec;38(4):284-6.

PMID:9522869
Abstract

Measurements were made of the intake of a WHO/UNICEF glucose-based and a rice cereal-based oral rehydration solution (ORS) by children with diarrhoea. Twenty children who presented to the Children's Outpatient Department at Port Moresby General Hospital with acute diarrhoea and mild dehydration were randomly assigned to an ORS and measurements were taken over the following 3 hours. For data analysis, the patients were paired by weight. Testing the means of the paired samples by t test showed that there was no significant difference between the amount of rice ORS and the amount of glucose ORS taken over 3 hours.

摘要

对腹泻儿童摄入世界卫生组织/联合国儿童基金会的葡萄糖基口服补液盐(ORS)和米粉基口服补液盐的情况进行了测量。20名因急性腹泻和轻度脱水到莫尔斯比港总医院儿童门诊部就诊的儿童被随机分配到一种口服补液盐组,并在接下来的3小时内进行测量。为了进行数据分析,根据体重将患者配对。通过t检验对配对样本的均值进行检验,结果显示在3小时内摄入的米粉口服补液盐量和葡萄糖口服补液盐量之间没有显著差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验