Ohm O J
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1979 Jul;2(4):465-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1979.tb05223.x.
Electrogram maximum derivatives (DMAX, SMAX) and electrogram amplitudes (AMAX, UMAX) (Figure 2), were studied in 71 cases during permanent pacemaker treatment. During the acute phase, (at first implantation), 29 patients were studied, and during the chronic phase, (at pulse generator replacement), 42 patients were studied. Of these patients, 27 (acute phase) and 36 (chronic phase) were studied for tissue impedance (RT) and interface impedance (Faraday resistance RF and Helmholtz capacity CH). DMAX and SMAX changed from 3.47 +/- 0.33 V/s (mean +/- SEM) to 2.46 +/- 0.23 V/s and 1.93 +/- 0.20 V/s to 1.32 +/- 0.12 V/s; p < 0.02; p < 0.01. AMAX and UMAX remained nearly unchanged from acute to chronic phase. A paired comparison in 13 patients showed almost identical results. Electrograms recorded in patients with bundle branch block showed no statistical difference in DMAX, SMAX, AMAX, and UMAX compared with electrograms recorded in patients with QRS-complexes of normal duration. No correlation was found between rise in myocardial threshold and fall in DMAX and SMAX from acute to chronic phase; p > 0.8, p > 0.5. Patients with coronary heart disease were found to have significantly higher AMAX than patients classified as having rhythm disturbances of primary cause; p < 0.01. Extremely low values of amplitudes and maximum derivatives were found in some patients with myocardial infarctions and cardiomyopathies. No difference existed in DMAX, SMAX, AMAX, and UMAX recorded from electrodes with a 8 mm2 area compared with a 12 mm2 area (p > 0.5). RT was statistically significantly higher on the smaller compared with the larger surface electrodes (p > 0.005). There was a slight but not statistically significant fall in RT from acute to chronic phase (p > 0.2). RF ranged from 2.0-94.6 kohms. There was no statistically significant differences between the 8 mm2 compared with the 12 mm2 electrodes (p > 0.2). CH varied between 0.7 and 37.0 microfarads, with significantly lower values for the smallest electrodes (p < 0.05). In patients with electrograms of borderline amplitudes and maximum derivatives for being sensed, the low CH found with the small tip electrodes, will gave a higher risk of demand failure if the input impedance in the sensing circuit of a demand pacemaker is too low.
在71例永久性起搏器治疗患者中,研究了心电图最大导数(DMAX、SMAX)和心电图振幅(AMAX、UMAX)(图2)。急性期(首次植入时)研究了29例患者,慢性期(脉冲发生器更换时)研究了42例患者。这些患者中,27例(急性期)和36例(慢性期)研究了组织阻抗(RT)和界面阻抗(法拉第电阻RF和亥姆霍兹电容CH)。DMAX和SMAX从3.47±0.33V/s(平均值±标准误)变为2.46±0.23V/s以及从1.93±0.20V/s变为1.32±0.12V/s;p<0.02;p<0.01。AMAX和UMAX从急性期到慢性期几乎保持不变。对13例患者进行的配对比较显示了几乎相同的结果。与QRS波群持续时间正常的患者记录的心电图相比,束支传导阻滞患者记录的心电图在DMAX、SMAX、AMAX和UMAX方面无统计学差异。未发现从急性期到慢性期心肌阈值升高与DMAX和SMAX下降之间存在相关性;p>0.8,p>0.5。发现冠心病患者的AMAX显著高于原发性节律紊乱患者;p<0.01。在一些心肌梗死和心肌病患者中发现了极低的振幅和最大导数值。与面积为12mm²的电极记录的DMAX、SMAX、AMAX和UMAX相比,面积为8mm²的电极记录的这些参数无差异(p>0.5)。与较大的表面电极相比,较小表面电极的RT在统计学上显著更高(p>0.005)。从急性期到慢性期,RT略有下降但无统计学意义(p>0.2)。RF范围为2.0 - 94.6千欧。面积为8mm²与12mm²的电极之间无统计学显著差异(p>0.2)。CH在0.7至37.0微法之间变化,最小电极的CH值显著更低(p<0.05)。对于心电图振幅和最大导数处于可感知临界值的患者,如果按需起搏器感知电路中的输入阻抗过低,小尖端电极的低CH会导致按需功能失效的风险更高。