• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

荟萃分析与个体患者数据方差分析的比较。

Comparison of meta-analysis versus analysis of variance of individual patient data.

作者信息

Olkin I, Sampson A

机构信息

Department of Statistics, Stanford University, California 94305, USA.

出版信息

Biometrics. 1998 Mar;54(1):317-22.

PMID:9544524
Abstract

Meta-analysis is a method of synthesizing the results of independent studies. We consider the case in which there are multiple treatments and a control, with the goal of estimating the relative effect of each treatment based on continuous outcomes. Even when all data are available, rather than only summary data, it has become common to use meta-analytic estimators of treatment contrasts. Alternatively, we could use a two-way analysis of variance model with no interaction in which one factor is study and one factor is treatment. For the unbalanced case, we obtain the surprising result that the standard meta-analysis estimates of treatment contrasts are identical to the least squares estimators of treatment contrasts in the linear model. Because a meta-analysis of individual patient data can be considerably more costly in terms of data retrieval than a meta-analysis of summary data, this equivalence provides for cost-efficient analysis.

摘要

荟萃分析是一种综合独立研究结果的方法。我们考虑存在多种治疗方法和一个对照的情况,目标是基于连续结果估计每种治疗方法的相对效果。即使所有数据都可用,而不仅仅是汇总数据,使用治疗对比的荟萃分析估计量也已变得很常见。或者,我们可以使用一个无交互作用的双向方差分析模型,其中一个因素是研究,另一个因素是治疗。对于不平衡的情况,我们得到了一个令人惊讶的结果,即治疗对比的标准荟萃分析估计量与线性模型中治疗对比的最小二乘估计量相同。由于就数据检索而言,个体患者数据的荟萃分析可能比汇总数据的荟萃分析成本高得多,这种等效性提供了具有成本效益的分析方法。

相似文献

1
Comparison of meta-analysis versus analysis of variance of individual patient data.荟萃分析与个体患者数据方差分析的比较。
Biometrics. 1998 Mar;54(1):317-22.
2
Comparison of one-step and two-step meta-analysis models using individual patient data.使用个体患者数据对一步法和两步法Meta分析模型进行比较。
Biom J. 2010 Apr;52(2):271-87. doi: 10.1002/bimj.200900143.
3
Meta-analysis of individual patient data versus aggregate data from longitudinal clinical trials.纵向临床试验中个体患者数据与汇总数据的Meta分析。
Clin Trials. 2009 Feb;6(1):16-27. doi: 10.1177/1740774508100984.
4
Meta-analysis combining parallel and cross-over clinical trials. III: The issue of carry-over.合并平行和交叉临床试验的Meta分析。III:遗留问题
Stat Med. 2002 Aug 15;21(15):2161-73. doi: 10.1002/sim.1207.
5
[Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].[意大利关于空气污染短期影响研究的荟萃分析]
Epidemiol Prev. 2001 Mar-Apr;25(2 Suppl):1-71.
6
Meta-analysis of diagnostic test studies using individual patient data and aggregate data.使用个体患者数据和汇总数据对诊断试验研究进行的Meta分析。
Stat Med. 2008 Dec 20;27(29):6111-36. doi: 10.1002/sim.3441.
7
[Statistical analysis of community-based studies -- presentation and comparison of possible solutions with reference to statistical meta-analytic methods].[基于社区研究的统计分析——参照统计元分析方法介绍并比较可能的解决方案]
Gesundheitswesen. 2005 Jan;67(1):48-55. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-813834.
8
Imputing variance estimates do not alter the conclusions of a meta-analysis with continuous outcomes: a case study of changes in renal function after living kidney donation.估算方差估计值不会改变连续性结局的荟萃分析结论:活体肾捐赠后肾功能变化的案例研究。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Mar;60(3):228-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.06.018. Epub 2006 Oct 23.
9
Generalized least squares for the synthesis of correlated information.用于合成相关信息的广义最小二乘法。
Biostatistics. 2003 Jul;4(3):423-31. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/4.3.423.
10
On the equivalence of meta-analysis using literature and using individual patient data.关于使用文献和使用个体患者数据进行的荟萃分析的等效性。
Biometrics. 1999 Dec;55(4):1221-3. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341x.1999.01221.x.

引用本文的文献

1
BUILDING A DOSE TOXO-EQUIVALENCE MODEL FROM A BAYESIAN META-ANALYSIS OF PUBLISHED CLINICAL TRIALS.基于已发表临床试验的贝叶斯荟萃分析构建剂量毒性当量模型。
Ann Appl Stat. 2023 Dec;17(4):2993-3012. doi: 10.1214/23-aoas1748. Epub 2023 Oct 30.
2
A hierarchical meta-analysis for settings involving multiple outcomes across multiple cohorts.针对涉及多个队列中多个结局的情况进行的分层荟萃分析。
Stat (Int Stat Inst). 2022 Dec;11(1). doi: 10.1002/sta4.462. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
3
Two-stage or not two-stage? That is the question for IPD meta-analysis projects.
两阶段还是不两阶段?这是 IPD 荟萃分析项目的问题。
Res Synth Methods. 2023 Nov;14(6):903-910. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1661. Epub 2023 Aug 22.
4
Exercise and Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors in Children and Adolescents With Obesity: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.肥胖儿童和青少年的运动与心血管疾病风险因素:一项对随机对照试验进行荟萃分析的系统评价
Am J Lifestyle Med. 2021 Feb 19;16(4):485-510. doi: 10.1177/1559827620988839. eCollection 2022 Jul-Aug.
5
Effects  of rural-urban residence and education on intimate partner violence among women in Sub-Saharan Africa: a meta-analysis of health survey data.城乡居住和教育对撒哈拉以南非洲妇女亲密伴侣暴力的影响:健康调查数据的荟萃分析。
BMC Womens Health. 2021 Apr 13;21(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12905-021-01286-5.
6
Relative efficiency of using summary versus individual data in random-effects meta-analysis.随机效应荟萃分析中使用汇总数据与个体数据的相对效率。
Biometrics. 2020 Dec;76(4):1319-1329. doi: 10.1111/biom.13238. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
7
Generalized meta-analysis for multiple regression models across studies with disparate covariate information.针对具有不同协变量信息的多项研究的多元回归模型进行广义荟萃分析。
Biometrika. 2019 Sep;106(3):567-585. doi: 10.1093/biomet/asz030. Epub 2019 Jul 13.
8
Treatment-Related Adverse Events of PD-1 and PD-L1 Inhibitors in Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.临床试验中 PD-1 和 PD-L1 抑制剂的治疗相关不良反应:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Oncol. 2019 Jul 1;5(7):1008-1019. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.0393.
9
On the differences between mega- and meta-imputation and analysis exemplified on the genetics of age-related macular degeneration.以年龄相关性黄斑变性的遗传学为例,探讨巨量填补和元填补与分析之间的差异。
Genet Epidemiol. 2019 Jul;43(5):559-576. doi: 10.1002/gepi.22204. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
10
An Empirical Comparison of Meta- and Mega-Analysis With Data From the ENIGMA Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Working Group.基于ENIGMA强迫症工作组数据的元分析与大分析的实证比较
Front Neuroinform. 2019 Jan 8;12:102. doi: 10.3389/fninf.2018.00102. eCollection 2018.