• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较腹腔镜和开放无张力腹股沟疝修补术与肖尔代斯手术的前瞻性随机研究。

Prospective randomized study comparing laparoscopic and open tension-free inguinal hernia repair with Shouldice's operation.

作者信息

Zieren J, Zieren H U, Jacobi C A, Wenger F A, Müller J M

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Charité, Humboldt University of Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Am J Surg. 1998 Apr;175(4):330-3. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(98)00004-x.

DOI:10.1016/s0002-9610(98)00004-x
PMID:9568665
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although tension-free techniques of hernia repair using synthetic meshes revealed encouraging results, the best method of inguinal hernia repair is still unclear.

METHODS

In a prospective randomized phase-II-B study, early postoperative results of laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair (n = 80), open plug and patch repair (n = 80), and Shouldice's operation (n = 80) were compared. Postoperative pain and patient's comfort were defined as main endpoints.

RESULTS

The laparoscopic approach had significantly longer operation time and was more expensive (61 +/- 12 minutes; $1,211) than plug and patch repair (36 +/- 14 minutes; $124) and Shouldice's operation (47 +/- 17 minutes; $69). Main postoperative complications were wound hematomas, seromas, and superficial wound infection, without significant difference between the groups. Postoperative pain, analgesia requirements, limitation of daily activities, and return to work did not differ between laparoscopic and open tension-free repair but were significantly lower in both groups compared with Shouldice's operation. So far, no recurrence was observed after a mean follow-up of 25 months.

CONCLUSION

Open plug and patch repair is a promising technique of hernia repair in adults, because it offers the same excellent patient comfort as the laparoscopic repair but is less expensive and can be performed under local anesthesia.

摘要

背景

尽管使用合成补片的无张力疝修补技术显示出令人鼓舞的结果,但腹股沟疝修补的最佳方法仍不明确。

方法

在一项前瞻性随机II - B期研究中,比较了腹腔镜经腹腹膜前修补术(n = 80)、开放疝环充填式无张力疝修补术(n = 80)和Shouldice手术(n = 80)的术后早期结果。将术后疼痛和患者舒适度定义为主要终点。

结果

腹腔镜手术方法的手术时间明显更长,费用也更高(61 ± 12分钟;1211美元),相比疝环充填式无张力疝修补术(36 ± 14分钟;124美元)和Shouldice手术(47 ± 17分钟;69美元)。术后主要并发症为伤口血肿、血清肿和浅表伤口感染,各组之间无显著差异。腹腔镜和开放无张力修补术后的疼痛、镇痛需求、日常活动受限情况以及恢复工作情况无差异,但与Shouldice手术相比,两组均显著更低。到目前为止,平均随访25个月后未观察到复发情况。

结论

开放疝环充填式无张力疝修补术是成人疝修补的一种有前景的技术,因为它与腹腔镜修补术一样能为患者提供同样良好的舒适度,但费用更低,且可在局部麻醉下进行。

相似文献

1
Prospective randomized study comparing laparoscopic and open tension-free inguinal hernia repair with Shouldice's operation.比较腹腔镜和开放无张力腹股沟疝修补术与肖尔代斯手术的前瞻性随机研究。
Am J Surg. 1998 Apr;175(4):330-3. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(98)00004-x.
2
Randomized controlled study of laparoscopic total extraperitoneal versus open Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair.腹腔镜完全腹膜外修补术与开放式李金斯坦腹股沟疝修补术的随机对照研究
Surg Endosc. 2003 Jun;17(6):850-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-8575-6. Epub 2003 Mar 28.
3
First Hungarian, internet-based prospective, multicenter study: the hernia-project.匈牙利首个基于互联网的前瞻性多中心研究:疝气项目。
Acta Chir Hung. 1999;38(2):219-20.
4
Randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open mesh repair for inguinal hernia: outcome and cost.腹腔镜与开放网片修补术治疗腹股沟疝的随机对照试验:结果与成本
BMJ. 1998 Jul 11;317(7151):103-10. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7151.103.
5
A randomized prospective controlled trial of laparoscopic extraperitoneal hernia repair and mesh-plug hernioplasty: a study of 315 cases.腹腔镜腹膜外疝修补术与疝环充填式无张力疝修补术的随机前瞻性对照试验:315例研究
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 1998 Dec;8(6):367-72. doi: 10.1089/lap.1998.8.367.
6
Inguinal hernia: an old condition with new solutions.腹股沟疝:一种有新解决方案的古老病症。
Ann Surg. 2003 Dec;238(6 Suppl):S148-57. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000097796.63010.e8.
7
Hernioplasty and simultaneous laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized study of open tension-free versus laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.疝修补术与同期腹腔镜胆囊切除术:开放无张力疝修补术与腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术的前瞻性随机研究
Surgery. 2001 May;129(5):530-6. doi: 10.1067/msy.2001.112962.
8
[Laparoscopic or conventional repair of inguinal hernia with synthetic mesh?].[腹腔镜或传统方法使用合成补片修补腹股沟疝?]
Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1996;381(5):289-94. doi: 10.1007/BF00184051.
9
[Open mesh technique versus laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) approach in inguinal hernia repair. Our experience].[开放网片技术与腹腔镜经腹腹膜前(TAPP)入路在腹股沟疝修补术中的应用。我们的经验]
G Chir. 2008 Nov-Dec;29(11-12):497-504.
10
Comparison of postoperative short-term complications after laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) versus Lichtenstein tension free inguinal hernia repair: a randomized trial study.腹腔镜经腹腹膜前修补术(TAPP)与Lichtenstein无张力腹股沟疝修补术后短期并发症的比较:一项随机试验研究
Minerva Chir. 2015 Apr;70(2):83-9. Epub 2014 Jul 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of short- and long-term efficacy and economic indicators between transabdominal preperitoneal and open tension-free repair for inguinal hernia in adults: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.成人腹股沟疝经腹腹膜前修补术与开放式无张力修补术的短期和长期疗效及经济指标比较:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Hernia. 2025 Aug 7;29(1):248. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03435-3.
2
Mesh versus non-mesh for inguinal and femoral hernia repair.用于腹股沟疝和股疝修补的补片与非补片对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 13;9(9):CD011517. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011517.pub2.
3
International guidelines for groin hernia management.
腹股沟疝治疗的国际指南。
Hernia. 2018 Feb;22(1):1-165. doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1668-x. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
4
Transabdominal Pre-Peritoneal Versus Open Repair for Primary Unilateral Inguinal Hernia: A Meta-analysis.经腹腹膜前修补术与开放修补术治疗原发性单侧腹股沟疝的Meta分析
World J Surg. 2018 May;42(5):1304-1311. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4288-9.
5
Effect of platelet-rich plasma on polypropylene meshes implanted in the rabbit vagina: histological analysis.富血小板血浆对植入兔阴道的聚丙烯网片的影响:组织学分析
Int Braz J Urol. 2017 Jul-Aug;43(4):746-752. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2016.0177.
6
Prosthetic Mesh Repair for Incarcerated Inguinal Hernia.嵌顿性腹股沟疝的人工补片修补术
Balkan Med J. 2016 Jul;33(4):434-40. doi: 10.5152/balkanmedj.2016.150137. Epub 2016 Jul 1.
7
Open Mesh Repair for Inguinal Hernia is Safer than Laparoscopic Repair or Open Non-mesh Repair: A Nationwide Registry Study of Complications.腹股沟疝开放补片修补术比腹腔镜修补术或开放无补片修补术更安全:一项关于并发症的全国性登记研究
World J Surg. 2015 Aug;39(8):1878-84; discussion 1885-6. doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-3028-2.
8
Prospective randomized clinical trial of Jean Rives technique versus laparoscopic TEP repair for primary inguinal hernia: 10-year follow-up.让·里夫斯技术与腹腔镜经腹膜前修补术治疗原发性腹股沟疝的前瞻性随机临床试验:10年随访
Hernia. 2015 Jun;19(3):383-7. doi: 10.1007/s10029-015-1350-0. Epub 2015 Feb 5.
9
Shouldice technique versus other open techniques for inguinal hernia repair.Shouldice技术与其他腹股沟疝修补开放技术的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Apr 18;2012(4):CD001543. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001543.pub4.
10
Prosthetic repair of incarcerated inguinal hernias: is it a reliable method?人工修复嵌顿性腹股沟疝:是否可靠?
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2010 Jun;395(5):575-9. doi: 10.1007/s00423-008-0326-2. Epub 2008 May 27.