Piper B F, Dibble S L, Dodd M J, Weiss M C, Slaughter R E, Paul S M
College of Nursing, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, USA.
Oncol Nurs Forum. 1998 May;25(4):677-84.
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To confirm the multidimensionality of the Piper Fatigue Scale (PFS) and to reduce the total number of PFS items without compromising reliability and validity estimates.
Methodologic, part of a larger, cross-sectional, mailed survey design study.
Urban and suburban area in the northeast United States.
As part of the larger study, 2,250 surveys were distributed to women survivors of breast cancer who were on a mailing list for the educational organization Living Beyond Breast Cancer, 715 surveys (32%) were returned. Of these, 382 women met this methodologic study's criteria for having completed each of the 40 items on the PFS. The average respondent was 50 years old, postmenopausal, and treated with combination cancer therapy.
Principal axes factor analysis with oblique rotation.
Fatigue factors/subscales.
Five factors/subscales were identified initially. Because the fifth factor contained only two items (ability to bathe/wash and ability to dress), these items and the associated factor/subscale were dropped from the final solution. An additional nine items, not loading on any factor (> 0.40), also were dropped. The remaining items and factors/subscales were reviewed to ensure that the criteria were met: a pattern of inter-item correlations between 0.30-0.70; a minimum number of five or more items/subscale; standardized alpha for the subscales and total scale of at least 0.89; and absence of gender-specific items.
The revised version of the PFS consists of 22 items and four subscales: behavioral/severity (6 items), affective meaning (5 items), sensory (5 items) and cognitive/mood (6 items). Standardized alpha for the entire scale (n = 22 items) is 0.97, indicating that some redundancy still may exist among the items. Additional revisions await further testing.
As fatigue is acknowledged to be the most frequent symptom experienced by patients with cancer, accurate measurement and assessment is essential to advance not only the science of fatigue but, most importantly, to evaluate the efficacy of intervention strategies on patient and family outcomes.
目的/目标:确认派珀疲劳量表(PFS)的多维性,并减少PFS项目总数,同时不影响可靠性和有效性评估。
方法学研究,是一项更大规模的横断面邮寄调查设计研究的一部分。
美国东北部的城市和郊区。
作为更大规模研究的一部分,向“超越乳腺癌生存”教育组织邮件列表中的乳腺癌女性幸存者发放了2250份调查问卷,共收回715份(32%)。其中,382名女性符合本方法学研究的标准,即完成了PFS上的40个项目中的每一项。受访者的平均年龄为50岁,处于绝经后,接受过联合癌症治疗。
采用斜交旋转的主轴因子分析。
疲劳因子/分量表。
最初确定了五个因子/分量表。由于第五个因子仅包含两个项目(洗澡/洗漱能力和穿衣能力),这些项目及相关因子/分量表从最终结果中剔除。另外九个未在任何因子上负荷(>0.40)的项目也被剔除。对剩余的项目和因子/分量表进行了审查,以确保符合以下标准:项目间相关模式在0.30 - 0.70之间;每个分量表至少有五个或更多项目;分量表和总量表的标准化α系数至少为0.89;且不存在特定性别的项目。
修订后的PFS版本由22个项目和四个分量表组成:行为/严重程度(6个项目)、情感意义(5个项目)、感觉(5个项目)和认知/情绪(6个项目)。整个量表(n = 22个项目)的标准化α系数为0.97,表明项目之间可能仍存在一些冗余。进一步的修订有待进一步测试。
由于疲劳被认为是癌症患者最常经历的症状,准确的测量和评估不仅对推进疲劳科学至关重要,而且最重要的是,对评估干预策略对患者和家庭结果的疗效至关重要。