Suppr超能文献

环境化学物质测试中的无脊椎动物:它们是替代品吗?

Invertebrates in testing of environmental chemicals: are they alternatives?

作者信息

Lagadic L, Caquet T

机构信息

Unité d'Ecotoxicologie Aquatique, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Rennes, France.

出版信息

Environ Health Perspect. 1998 Apr;106 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):593-611. doi: 10.1289/ehp.98106593.

Abstract

An enlarged interpretation of alternatives in toxicology testing includes the replacement of one animal species with another, preferably a nonmammalian species. This paper reviews the potential of invertebrates in testing environmental chemicals and provides evidence of their usefulness in alternative testing methodologies. The first part of this review addresses the use of invertebrates in laboratory toxicology testing. Problems in extrapolating results obtained in invertebrates to those obtained from vertebrates are noted, suggesting that invertebrates can essentially be used in addition to rather than as replacements for vertebrates in laboratory toxicity tests. However, evaluation of the ecologic impact of environmental chemicals must include defining end points that may frequently differ from those classically used in biomedical research. In this context, alternative approaches using invertebrates may be more pertinent. The second part of the review therefore focuses on the use of invertebrates in situ to assess the environmental impact of pollutants. Advantages of invertebrates in ecotoxicologic investigation are presented for their usefulness for seeking mechanistic links between effects occurring at the individual level and consequences for higher levels of biologic organization (e.g., population and community). In the end, it is considered that replacement of vertebrates by invertebrates in ecotoxicity testing is likely to become a reality when basic knowledge of metabolic, physiologic, and developmental patterns in the latter will be sufficient to assess the effect of a given chemical through end points that could be different between invertebrates and vertebrates.

摘要

毒理学测试中对替代方法的广义解释包括用一种动物替代另一种动物,最好是用非哺乳动物。本文综述了无脊椎动物在环境化学物质测试中的潜力,并提供了它们在替代测试方法中有用性的证据。本综述的第一部分论述了无脊椎动物在实验室毒理学测试中的应用。文中指出了将无脊椎动物实验结果外推至脊椎动物实验结果时存在的问题,这表明在实验室毒性测试中,无脊椎动物基本上可作为脊椎动物的补充,而非替代品。然而,对环境化学物质生态影响的评估必须包括确定可能与生物医学研究中传统使用的终点不同的终点。在这种情况下,使用无脊椎动物的替代方法可能更具相关性。因此,综述的第二部分重点关注无脊椎动物在原位评估污染物环境影响方面的应用。文中阐述了无脊椎动物在生态毒理学研究中的优势,即它们有助于探寻个体水平上的效应与更高生物组织水平(如种群和群落)的后果之间的机制联系。最后,人们认为,当对无脊椎动物的代谢、生理和发育模式有足够的基础知识,能够通过无脊椎动物和脊椎动物可能不同的终点来评估特定化学物质的影响时,在生态毒性测试中用无脊椎动物替代脊椎动物可能会成为现实。

相似文献

2
Biomarker strategies to evaluate the environmental effects of chemicals.评估化学物质环境影响的生物标志物策略。
Environ Health Perspect. 1998 Apr;106 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):613-20. doi: 10.1289/ehp.98106613.
4
Alternative methods for developmental toxicity testing.发育毒性试验的替代方法。
Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2006 May;98(5):427-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-7843.2006.pto_373.x.
7
Alternative test methods in inhalation toxicology: challenges and opportunities.吸入毒理学中的替代测试方法:挑战与机遇
Exp Toxicol Pathol. 2008 Jun;60(2-3):105-9. doi: 10.1016/j.etp.2008.01.001. Epub 2008 May 16.
10
Alternative animal models in predictive toxicology.预测毒理学中的替代动物模型。
Toxicology. 2022 Jan 15;465:153053. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2021.153053. Epub 2021 Nov 24.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

4
Three decades of tributyltin in the coastal environment with emphasis on Arcachon Bay, France.
Environ Pollut. 1996;93(2):195-203. doi: 10.1016/0269-7491(96)00029-2.
5
Tributyltin biomonitoring using prosobranchs as sentinel organisms.
Anal Bioanal Chem. 1996 Mar;354(5-6):540-5. doi: 10.1007/s0021663540540.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验