Suppr超能文献

化学品安全评估方法科学小组(SGOMSEC)第13次会议:生态毒性替代测试方法

13th Meeting of the Scientific Group on Methodologies for the Safety Evaluation of Chemicals (SGOMSEC): alternative testing methodologies for ecotoxicity.

作者信息

Walker C, Kaiser K, Klein W, Lagadic L, Peakall D, Sheffield S, Soldan T, Yasuno M

机构信息

University Whiteknights, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Environ Health Perspect. 1998 Apr;106 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):441-51. doi: 10.1289/ehp.98106441.

Abstract

There is growing public pressure to minimize the use of vertebrates in ecotoxicity testing; therefore, effective alternatives to toxicity tests causing suffering are being sought. This report discusses alternatives and differs in some respects from the reports of the other three groups because the primary concern is with harmful effects of chemicals at the level of population and above rather than with harmful effects upon individuals. It is concluded that progress toward the objective of minimizing testing that causes suffering would be served by the following initiatives--a clearer definition of goals and strategies when undertaking testing procedures; development of alternative assays, including in vitro test systems, that are based on new technology; development of nondestructive assays for vertebrates (e.g., biomarkers) that do not cause suffering; selection of most appropriate species, strains, and developmental stages for testing procedures (but no additional species for basic testing); better integrated and more flexible testing procedures incorporating biomarker responses, ecophysiological concepts, and ecological end points (progress in this direction depends upon expert judgment). In general, testing procedures could be made more realistic, taking into account problems with mixtures, and with volatile or insoluble chemicals.

摘要

公众要求尽量减少在生态毒性测试中使用脊椎动物的压力日益增大;因此,正在寻求造成痛苦的毒性测试的有效替代方法。本报告讨论了替代方法,并且在某些方面与其他三个小组的报告有所不同,因为主要关注的是化学品在种群及以上层面的有害影响,而非对个体的有害影响。得出的结论是,通过以下举措将有助于实现尽量减少造成痛苦的测试这一目标:在进行测试程序时更明确地界定目标和战略;开发基于新技术的替代试验,包括体外测试系统;开发不会造成痛苦的脊椎动物无损检测方法(例如生物标志物);为测试程序选择最合适的物种、品系和发育阶段(但基础测试不增加物种);纳入生物标志物反应、生态生理学概念和生态终点,使测试程序更加综合和灵活(朝这个方向取得进展取决于专家判断)。一般而言,考虑到混合物以及挥发性或不溶性化学品的问题,测试程序可以更加贴近实际情况。

相似文献

4
Biomarker strategies to evaluate the environmental effects of chemicals.评估化学物质环境影响的生物标志物策略。
Environ Health Perspect. 1998 Apr;106 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):613-20. doi: 10.1289/ehp.98106613.
8
Ecotoxicity testing: science, politics and ethics.生态毒性测试:科学、政治与伦理
Altern Lab Anim. 2008 Feb;36(1):103-12. doi: 10.1177/026119290803600111.

本文引用的文献

1
Biomarker strategies to evaluate the environmental effects of chemicals.评估化学物质环境影响的生物标志物策略。
Environ Health Perspect. 1998 Apr;106 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):613-20. doi: 10.1289/ehp.98106613.
4
Is there any place for nonmammalian in vitro tests?
Reprod Toxicol. 1993;7 Suppl 1:99-102. doi: 10.1016/0890-6238(93)90074-h.
5
Comparative toxicity of azinphos-methyl to house mice, laboratory mice, deer mice, and gray-tailed voles.
Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 1994 May;26(4):478-82. doi: 10.1007/BF00214150.
6
The micronucleus assay in Crassostrea gigas for the detection of seawater genotoxicity.
Mutat Res. 1995 Apr;342(3-4):125-40. doi: 10.1016/0165-1218(95)90022-5.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验