Gaygen D E, Luce P A
Department of Psychology, State University of New York, Buffalo 14260, USA.
Percept Psychophys. 1998 Apr;60(3):465-83. doi: 10.3758/bf03206867.
Previous research (Garber & Pisoni, 1991; Pisoni & Garber, 1990) has demonstrated that subjective familiarity judgments for words are not differentially affected by the modality (visual or auditory) in which the words are presented, suggesting that participants base their judgments on fairly abstract, modality-independent representations in memory. However, in a recent large-scale study in Japanese (Amano, Kondo, & Kakehi, 1995), marked modality effects on familiarity ratings were observed. The present research further examined possible modality differences in subjective ratings and their implications for word recognition. Specially selected words were presented to participants for frequency judgments. In particular, participants were asked how frequently they read, wrote, heard, or said a given spoken or printed word. These ratings were then regressed against processing times in auditory and visual lexical decision and naming tasks. Our results suggest modality dependence for some lexical representations.
先前的研究(加伯和皮索尼,1991年;皮索尼和加伯,1990年)表明,单词的主观熟悉度判断不会因呈现单词的方式(视觉或听觉)而受到不同影响,这表明参与者是基于记忆中相当抽象的、与方式无关的表征来做出判断的。然而,在最近一项针对日语的大规模研究中(天野、近藤和加计,1995年),观察到了熟悉度评级上明显的方式效应。本研究进一步考察了主观评级中可能存在的方式差异及其对单词识别的影响。特别挑选的单词呈现给参与者进行频率判断。具体而言,参与者被问及他们阅读、书写、听到或说出某个给定的口语或印刷单词的频率有多高。然后,将这些评级与听觉和视觉词汇判断及命名任务中的处理时间进行回归分析。我们的结果表明某些词汇表征存在方式依赖性。