Valentine T, Hollis J, Moore V
Department of Psychology, Goldsmiths College, University of London, England.
Mem Cognit. 1998 Jul;26(4):740-53. doi: 10.3758/bf03211394.
Two experiments are reported that tested predictions derived from the framework of face, object, and word recognition proposed by Valentine, Brennen, and Brédart (1996). The findings were as follows: (1) Production of a celebrity's name in response to seeing the celebrity's face primed a subsequent familiarity decision to the celebrity's printed name. The degree of repetition priming observed was as great as that observed when a familiarity decision to the printed name was repeated in the prime and test phases of the experiment. (2) Making a familiarity decision to an auditory presentation of a celebrity's name primed a familiarity decision to the same celebrity's name presented visually. The magnitude of cross-modality priming was as great as the magnitude of within-modality repetition priming. This result for people's names contrasted with the effects observed in lexical decision tasks, in which no reliable cross-modality priming was observed. The results cannot be accounted for by previous models of face and name processing. They show a marked contrast between processing people's names and processing words. The results support the framework proposed by Valentine et al. (1996). The implications for models of speech production, perception, and reading are discussed, together with the potential of the methodology to elucidate our understanding of proper name processing.
本文报告了两项实验,检验了从瓦伦丁、布伦南和布雷达特(1996年)提出的面部、物体和单词识别框架中得出的预测。研究结果如下:(1)看到名人的脸后说出该名人的名字,会启动随后对该名人印刷名字的熟悉度判断。观察到的重复启动程度与在实验的启动阶段和测试阶段对印刷名字进行重复的熟悉度判断时观察到的程度一样大。(2)对名人名字的听觉呈现做出熟悉度判断,会启动对同一名人名字的视觉呈现的熟悉度判断。跨模态启动的程度与模态内重复启动的程度一样大。这个关于人名的结果与在词汇判断任务中观察到的效果形成对比,在词汇判断任务中没有观察到可靠的跨模态启动。以前的面部和名字处理模型无法解释这些结果。它们显示了人名处理和单词处理之间的明显对比。这些结果支持了瓦伦丁等人(1996年)提出的框架。讨论了对言语产生、感知和阅读模型的影响,以及该方法在阐明我们对专有名词处理理解方面的潜力。