• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2938个单音节词的主观频率估计

Subjective frequency estimates for 2,938 monosyllabic words.

作者信息

Balota D A, Pilotti M, Cortese M J

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri 63130-4899, USA.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 2001 Jun;29(4):639-47. doi: 10.3758/bf03200465.

DOI:10.3758/bf03200465
PMID:11504012
Abstract

Subjective frequency estimates for large sample of monosyllabic English words were collected from 574 young adults (undergraduate students) and from a separate group of 1,590 adults of varying ages and educational backgrounds. Estimates from the latter group were collected via the internet. In addition, 90 healthy older adults provided estimates for a random sample of 480 of these words. All groups rated words with respect to the estimated frequency of encounters of each word on a 7-point scale, ranging from never encountered to encountered several times a day. The young and older groups also rated each word with respect to the frequency of encounters in different perceptual domains (e.g., reading, hearing, writing, or speaking). The results of regression analyses indicated that objective log frequency and meaningfulness accounted for most of the variance in subjective frequency estimates, whereas neighborhood size accounted for the least amount of variance in the ratings. The predictive power of log frequency and meaningfulness were dependent on the level of subjective frequency estimates. Meaningfulness was a better predictor of subjective frequency for uncommon words, whereas log frequency was a better predictor of subjective frequency for common words. Our discussion focuses on the utility of subjective frequency estimates compared with other estimates of familiarity. The raw subjective frequency data for all words are available at http://www.artsci.wustl.edu/dbalota/labpub.html.

摘要

我们从574名年轻成年人(本科生)以及另一组由1590名不同年龄和教育背景的成年人中收集了大量单音节英语单词的主观频率估计值。后一组的估计值是通过互联网收集的。此外,90名健康的老年人对这些单词中的480个随机样本提供了估计值。所有组都根据每个单词的估计出现频率,在从从未遇到过到每天遇到几次的7分制量表上对单词进行评分。年轻组和老年组还根据单词在不同感知领域(如阅读、听力、写作或口语)中的出现频率对每个单词进行评分。回归分析结果表明,客观对数频率和意义性解释了主观频率估计中大部分的方差,而邻域大小在评分中解释的方差最少。对数频率和意义性的预测能力取决于主观频率估计的水平。对于不常见的单词,意义性是主观频率的更好预测指标,而对于常见的单词,对数频率是主观频率的更好预测指标。我们的讨论重点在于主观频率估计与其他熟悉度估计相比的效用。所有单词的原始主观频率数据可在http://www.artsci.wustl.edu/dbalota/labpub.html获取。

相似文献

1
Subjective frequency estimates for 2,938 monosyllabic words.2938个单音节词的主观频率估计
Mem Cognit. 2001 Jun;29(4):639-47. doi: 10.3758/bf03200465.
2
Age-of-acquisition and subjective frequency estimates for all generally known monosyllabic French words and their relation with other psycholinguistic variables.所有常见单音节法语单词的习得年龄和主观频率估计及其与其他心理语言学变量的关系。
Behav Res Methods. 2008 Nov;40(4):1049-54. doi: 10.3758/BRM.40.4.1049.
3
[Imagery norms and subjective frequency of 1,760 monosyllabic words in the French language].[法语中1760个单音节词的意象规范和主观频率]
Can J Exp Psychol. 2009 Jun;63(2):139-49. doi: 10.1037/a0015386.
4
Age-related evaluations of imageability and subjective frequency for 1286 neutral and emotional French words: ratings by young, middle-aged, and older adults.1286 个中性和情感法语单词的可想象性和主观频率的年龄相关评估:年轻人、中年人、老年人的评分。
Behav Res Methods. 2022 Feb;54(1):196-215. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01621-6. Epub 2021 Jun 15.
5
Imageability and age of acquisition effects in disyllabic word recognition.双音节词识别中的可意象性与习得年龄效应
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2013;66(5):946-72. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.722660. Epub 2012 Oct 2.
6
A mega recognition memory study of 2897 disyllabic words.一项对2897个双音节词的大型识别记忆研究。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2015;68(8):1489-501. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.945096. Epub 2014 Sep 15.
7
[Norms of subjective frequency of use and imagery for a sample of 1,916 French nouns].[1916个法语名词样本的主观使用频率和意象规范]
Can J Exp Psychol. 2000 Dec;54(4):274-325.
8
A psycholinguistic database for traditional Chinese character naming.一个用于繁体中文字符命名的心理语言学数据库。
Behav Res Methods. 2016 Mar;48(1):112-22. doi: 10.3758/s13428-014-0559-7.
9
An examination of word frequency and neighborhood density in the development of spoken-word recognition.口语单词识别发展过程中单词频率和邻域密度的考察。
Mem Cognit. 1997 Jan;25(1):47-56. doi: 10.3758/bf03197284.
10
Influence of encoding difficulty, word frequency, and phonological regularity on age differences in word naming.编码难度、词频和语音规律性对单词命名年龄差异的影响。
Exp Aging Res. 2011 May;37(3):261-92. doi: 10.1080/0361073X.2011.568805.

引用本文的文献

1
BRAND: Brand recognition and attitude norms database.品牌:品牌认知与态度规范数据库。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Dec 16;57(1):17. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02525-x.
2
Older adults' recognition of medical terminology in hospital noise.老年人在医院噪音环境中对医学术语的识别。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2024 Dec 5;9(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s41235-024-00606-1.
3
A dataset of subjective frequency estimates of the words of the peabody vocabulary test by Arabic-English bilingual speakers.一个由阿拉伯语-英语双语者对皮博迪词汇测试中的单词进行主观频率估计的数据集。

本文引用的文献

1
Neighborhood frequency does affect performance in the Reicher task: encoding or decision?邻域频率确实会影响里歇尔任务中的表现:是编码还是决策?
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2000 Dec;26(6):1691-720. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.26.6.1691.
2
Factors influencing word naming in younger and older adults.
Psychol Aging. 2000 Jun;15(2):225-31. doi: 10.1037//0882-7974.15.2.225.
3
Word frequency, repetition, and lexicality effects in word recognition tasks: beyond measures of central tendency.单词识别任务中的词频、重复和词汇性效应:超越集中趋势度量
Data Brief. 2024 Oct 22;57:111056. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2024.111056. eCollection 2024 Dec.
4
Corpus-based age of word acquisition: Does it support the validity of adult age-of-acquisition ratings?基于语料库的词汇习得年龄:它是否支持成人词汇习得年龄评定的有效性?
PLoS One. 2022 May 25;17(5):e0268504. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268504. eCollection 2022.
5
The Croatian psycholinguistic database: Estimates for 6000 nouns, verbs, adjectives and adverbs.克罗地亚心理语言学数据库:6000 个名词、动词、形容词和副词的估计值。
Behav Res Methods. 2021 Aug;53(4):1799-1816. doi: 10.3758/s13428-020-01533-x. Epub 2021 Apr 26.
6
The ASL-LEX 2.0 Project: A Database of Lexical and Phonological Properties for 2,723 Signs in American Sign Language.ASL-LEX 2.0 项目:美国手语 2723 个手语词汇的词汇和音韵属性数据库。
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2021 Mar 17;26(2):263-277. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enaa038.
7
Psycholinguistic norms for more than 300 lexical signs in German Sign Language (DGS).德语手语(DGS)中 300 多个词汇符号的心理语言学规范。
Behav Res Methods. 2021 Oct;53(5):1817-1832. doi: 10.3758/s13428-020-01524-y. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
8
Neurophysiological Correlates of Frequency, Concreteness, and Iconicity in American Sign Language.美国手语中频率、具体性和象似性的神经生理关联
Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2020;1(2):249-267. doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00012. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
9
The Glasgow Norms: Ratings of 5,500 words on nine scales.格拉斯哥规范:9 个尺度上对 5500 个单词的评分。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Jun;51(3):1258-1270. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1099-3.
10
Affective Meaning, Concreteness, and Subjective Frequency Norms for Indonesian Words.印尼语单词的情感意义、具体性和主观频率规范
Front Psychol. 2016 Dec 6;7:1907. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01907. eCollection 2016.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 1999 Mar;128(1):32-55. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.128.1.32.
4
Effects of modality on subjective frequency estimates and processing of spoken and printed words.模态对主观频率估计以及口语和印刷文字处理的影响。
Percept Psychophys. 1998 Apr;60(3):465-83. doi: 10.3758/bf03206867.
5
Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access.回声之回声?词汇通达的情景理论。
Psychol Rev. 1998 Apr;105(2):251-79. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.105.2.251.
6
Understanding normal and impaired word reading: computational principles in quasi-regular domains.理解正常与受损的单词阅读:准规则领域中的计算原理
Psychol Rev. 1996 Jan;103(1):56-115. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.103.1.56.
7
Modality dependency of familiarity ratings of Japanese words.
Percept Psychophys. 1995 Jul;57(5):598-603. doi: 10.3758/bf03213265.
8
Resolving 20 years of inconsistent interactions between lexical familiarity and orthography, concreteness, and polysemy.解决20年来词汇熟悉度与正字法、具体性和一词多义性之间不一致的相互作用问题。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 1984 Jun;113(2):256-81. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.113.2.256.
9
A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming.一种分布式的单词识别与命名发展模型。
Psychol Rev. 1989 Oct;96(4):523-68. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.96.4.523.