Mulder M, Ranchor A V, Sanderman R, Bouma J, van den Heuvel W J
Northern Centre for Healthcare Research, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
Int J Epidemiol. 1998 Apr;27(2):199-207. doi: 10.1093/ije/27.2.199.
The stability of lifestyle behaviour has been studied over a 4-year period in a sample of 1400 men in The Netherlands. The influence of both socioeconomic status and age was studied in relation to lifestyle behaviour change.
Lifestyle behaviour was analysed by means of index scores, each covering one of four domains: smoking, alcohol consumption, physical activity and dietary habits. Changes in lifestyle behaviour were analysed at individual and group level, using different statistical methods.
Smoking behaviour remained highly constant, whereas alcohol consumption had only moderate stability. Physical activity and dietary habits had greater variability over this time period. Age and socioeconomic status are related to the prevalence of lifestyle behaviour, whereas only age is related to the stability of lifestyle behaviour. Socioeconomic status did not relate to changes in lifestyle behaviour.
The four lifestyle behaviours differed in the degree of variation over a 4-year period. Only a small group (11%) changed two or more lifestyle behaviours. This implies that lifestyle behaviour is not a unified concept and should not be treated in that way in public health campaigns.
在荷兰的1400名男性样本中,对生活方式行为的稳定性进行了为期4年的研究。研究了社会经济地位和年龄对生活方式行为变化的影响。
通过指数得分分析生活方式行为,每个指数得分涵盖四个领域之一:吸烟、饮酒、体育活动和饮食习惯。使用不同的统计方法在个体和群体层面分析生活方式行为的变化。
吸烟行为保持高度稳定,而饮酒行为只有中等稳定性。在此期间,体育活动和饮食习惯的变异性更大。年龄和社会经济地位与生活方式行为的患病率有关,而只有年龄与生活方式行为的稳定性有关。社会经济地位与生活方式行为的变化无关。
在4年期间,四种生活方式行为的变化程度不同。只有一小部分人(11%)改变了两种或更多的生活方式行为。这意味着生活方式行为不是一个统一的概念,在公共卫生运动中不应如此对待。