Suppr超能文献

幽门螺杆菌根除方案的不同疗效:使用决策分析模型的成本效益研究

Varying efficacy of Helicobacter pylori eradication regimens: cost effectiveness study using a decision analysis model.

作者信息

Duggan A E, Tolley K, Hawkey C J, Logan R F

机构信息

Department of Public Health and Epidemiology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2UH.

出版信息

BMJ. 1998 May 30;316(7145):1648-54. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7145.1648.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine how small differences in the efficacy and cost of two antibiotic regimens to eradicate Helicobacter pylori can affect the overall cost effectiveness of H pylori eradication in duodenal ulcer disease.

DESIGN

A decision analysis to examine the cost effectiveness of eight H pylori eradication strategies for duodenal ulcer disease with and without 13C-urea breath testing to confirm eradication.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Cumulative direct treatment costs per 100 patients with duodenal ulcer disease who were positive for H pylori.

RESULTS

In model 1 the strategy of omeprazole, clarithromycin, and metronidazole alone was the most cost effective of the four strategies assessed. The addition of the 13C-urea breath test and a second course of omeprazole, clarithromycin, and metronidazole achieved the highest eradication rate (97%) but was the most expensive (62.63 pounds per patient). The cost of each additional effective eradication was 589.00 pounds (incremental cost per case) when compared with the cost of treating once only with omeprazole, clarithromycin, and metronidazole; equivalent to the cost of a patient receiving ranitidine for duodenal ulcer relapse for more than 15 years. Eradication strategies of omeprazole, amoxycillin, and metronidazole were less cost effective than omeprazole, clarithromycin, and metronidazole alone. In model 2 the addition of the 13C-urea breath test after treatment, and maintenance treatment, increased the cost of all the strategies and reduced the cost advantage of omeprazole, clarithromycin, and metronidazole alone.

CONCLUSION

Small differences in efficacy can influence the comparative cost effectiveness of strategies for eradicating H pylori. Of the strategies tested the most cost effective (omeprazole, clarithromycin, and metronidazole alone) was neither the least expensive (omeprazole, amoxycillin, and metronidazole alone) nor the most effective (omeprazole, clarithromycin, and metronidazole with further treatment for patients found positive for H pylori on 13C-urea breath testing). Cost effectiveness should be an important part of choosing an eradication strategy for H pylori.

摘要

目的

确定两种根除幽门螺杆菌的抗生素治疗方案在疗效和成本上的微小差异如何影响十二指肠溃疡疾病中幽门螺杆菌根除的总体成本效益。

设计

一项决策分析,用于研究十二指肠溃疡疾病的八种幽门螺杆菌根除策略的成本效益,以及有无13C-尿素呼气试验来确认根除情况。

主要观察指标

每100例幽门螺杆菌阳性的十二指肠溃疡疾病患者的累积直接治疗成本。

结果

在模型1中,单独使用奥美拉唑、克拉霉素和甲硝唑的策略是所评估的四种策略中最具成本效益的。添加13C-尿素呼气试验以及第二疗程的奥美拉唑、克拉霉素和甲硝唑可实现最高的根除率(97%),但也是最昂贵的(每位患者62.63英镑)。与仅使用一次奥美拉唑、克拉霉素和甲硝唑的治疗成本相比,每多成功根除一例的成本为589.00英镑(每例增量成本);相当于一名十二指肠溃疡复发患者接受雷尼替丁治疗超过15年的成本。奥美拉唑、阿莫西林和甲硝唑的根除策略比单独使用奥美拉唑、克拉霉素和甲硝唑的成本效益更低。在模型2中,治疗后添加13C-尿素呼气试验以及维持治疗增加了所有策略的成本,并降低了单独使用奥美拉唑、克拉霉素和甲硝唑的成本优势。

结论

疗效上的微小差异会影响根除幽门螺杆菌策略的相对成本效益。在所测试的策略中,最具成本效益的(单独使用奥美拉唑、克拉霉素和甲硝唑)既不是最便宜的(单独使用奥美拉唑、阿莫西林和甲硝唑),也不是最有效的(奥美拉唑、克拉霉素和甲硝唑,对13C-尿素呼气试验呈阳性的患者进行进一步治疗)。成本效益应是选择幽门螺杆菌根除策略的重要组成部分。

相似文献

7
Pharmacoeconomic comparison of Helicobacter pylori eradication regimens.幽门螺杆菌根除方案的药物经济学比较
Pharm World Sci. 2006 Aug;28(4):207-14. doi: 10.1007/s11096-006-9021-y. Epub 2006 Oct 26.

本文引用的文献

3
The decision rules of cost-effectiveness analysis.成本效益分析的决策规则。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1996 Feb;9(2):113-20. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199609020-00003.
10
Model of medical treatment for duodenal ulcer.十二指肠溃疡的医学治疗模式。
Lancet. 1981 Jan 3;1(8210):29-30. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(81)90128-8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验