Chuang Y C, Ko W C, Wang S T, Liu J W, Kuo C F, Wu J J, Huang K Y
Department of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998 Jun;42(6):1319-22. doi: 10.1128/AAC.42.6.1319.
We conducted an in vivo study with the mouse model of Vibrio vulnificus infection to evaluate the efficacies of therapy with minocycline or cefotaxime alone and in combination. V. vulnificus was introduced subcutaneously into the area over the right thigh. The inoculum size ranged from 1.0 x 10(3) to 1.2 x 10(8) CFU from experiment to experiment but was constant for all animals in the same experiment. Antibiotics were given intraperitoneally 2 h after the bacteria were inoculated. In experiments 1 to 4, the standard dose for humans was used to treat the infection, while in experiment 5, five times the standard dose for humans was used to treat the infection. In experiment 1, with a small inoculum of 5 x 10(3) CFU, all mice in the saline-treated control group and the cefotaxime-, minocycline-, and combined antibiotic-treated groups survived. In experiment 2, with a moderate inoculum of 1.2 x 10(5) CFU, all the mice in the three antibiotic-treated groups survived, while only two of nine mice in the control group survived. In experiment 3, with a large inoculum of 8.0 x 10(7) CFU, six of nine mice in the combined antibiotic-treated group survived, while only one of nine mice in the cefotaxime-treated group and none of the mice in the control and minocycline-treated groups survived. In experiment 4, with a large inoculum of 1.2 x 10(8) CFU, 8 of 20 mice in the combined antibiotic-treated group survived, while none of the 20 mice in the control group, the group treated with cefotaxime alone, and the group treated with minocycline alone survived. In experiment 5, in which mice were infected with a large inoculum of 6.6 x 10(7) CFU and treated with five times the standard human dose of antibiotics, 10 of 12 mice in the combined antibiotic-treated group survived, while only 4 of 12 mice in the minocycline-treated group, 1 of 12 mice in the cefotaxime-treated group, and none of the mice in the control group survived. In experiments 3 to 5, the difference in the survival rates between the combined antibiotic-treated and minocycline-treated groups was statistically significant (P < 0.05). These results indicate that combination therapy with cefotaxime and minocycline is distinctly more advantageous than therapy with the single antibiotic regimen for the treatment of severe experimental V. vulnificus infections.
我们使用创伤弧菌感染的小鼠模型进行了一项体内研究,以评估单独使用米诺环素或头孢噻肟以及联合使用这两种药物进行治疗的效果。将创伤弧菌皮下接种到右大腿上方区域。每次实验的接种量在1.0×10³至1.2×10⁸CFU之间变化,但在同一实验中的所有动物接种量保持恒定。在接种细菌2小时后通过腹腔注射给予抗生素。在实验1至4中,使用人类标准剂量来治疗感染,而在实验5中,使用人类标准剂量的五倍来治疗感染。在实验1中,接种量为5×10³CFU,生理盐水处理的对照组以及头孢噻肟、米诺环素和联合抗生素处理组的所有小鼠均存活。在实验2中,接种量为1.2×10⁵CFU,三个抗生素处理组的所有小鼠均存活,而对照组的9只小鼠中只有2只存活。在实验3中,接种量为8.0×10⁷CFU,联合抗生素处理组的9只小鼠中有6只存活,而头孢噻肟处理组的9只小鼠中只有1只存活,对照组和米诺环素处理组的小鼠均无存活。在实验4中,接种量为1.2×10⁸CFU,联合抗生素处理组的20只小鼠中有8只存活,而对照组、单独使用头孢噻肟处理组和单独使用米诺环素处理组的20只小鼠均无存活。在实验5中,小鼠接种量为6.6×10⁷CFU并使用人类标准剂量五倍的抗生素进行治疗,联合抗生素处理组的12只小鼠中有10只存活,而米诺环素处理组的12只小鼠中只有4只存活,头孢噻肟处理组的12只小鼠中只有1只存活,对照组的小鼠均无存活。在实验3至5中,联合抗生素处理组和米诺环素处理组之间的存活率差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。这些结果表明,对于治疗严重的实验性创伤弧菌感染,头孢噻肟和米诺环素联合治疗明显比单一抗生素治疗方案更具优势。