Rosser J C, Rosser L E, Savalgi R S
Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn 06510, USA.
Arch Surg. 1998 Jun;133(6):657-61. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.133.6.657.
Laparoscopic surgery adapts poorly to apprenticeship models for general surgical training. Standardized skill acquisition and validation programs, targeted performance goals, and a supervised, enforced, skill-based curriculum that readily can be shared between trainee and instructor must replace the observation and incremental skill-acquisition model used in an open surgical environment. The Yale Laparoscopic Skills and Suturing Program was used to develop a data bank for objective evaluation of dexterity and suturing skills for laparoscopic surgical training. The current study compares trainee and senior surgeon performance in this standardized training program.
To compare objectively evaluated laparoscopic surgical skills and suturing capability of senior surgeons and of residents after they have completed the same standardized training regimen.
Two hundred ninety-one trained surgeons performed 8730 standardized laparoscopic dexterity drills and 2910 intracorporeal suturing exercises in the Yale Laparoscopic Skills and Suturing Program. Their performance was supervised by an instructor who recorded performance and timing of the tasks in a 2 1/2-day program. Ninety-nine residents performed the same drills and exercises the same number of times and followed the same technique for intracorporeal suturing. Percentile graphs were prepared for each type of drill and suturing exercise to allow comparison of levels of achievement among different training groups.
The performance of the residents was the same as that of trained surgeons for the rope pass drill and the suturing exercise. Residents in comparison with trained surgeons performed the triangle transfer drill faster and the new cup drop drill and old cup drop drill more slowly. There was no significant difference in performance between male and female residents.
Basic skills relevant to laparoscopic performance can be acquired with a high level of competence in a brief course unrelated to prior surgical experience, sex, or age.
腹腔镜手术不太适合普通外科培训的学徒模式。标准化的技能获取与验证项目、有针对性的绩效目标以及一个易于在学员和教员之间共享的、受监督、强制执行且基于技能的课程,必须取代开放手术环境中使用的观察和渐进式技能获取模式。耶鲁腹腔镜技能与缝合项目被用于建立一个数据库,以客观评估腹腔镜手术培训中的灵巧性和缝合技能。本研究比较了学员和资深外科医生在这个标准化培训项目中的表现。
比较资深外科医生和住院医师在完成相同标准化培训方案后,经客观评估的腹腔镜手术技能和缝合能力。
291名经过培训的外科医生在耶鲁腹腔镜技能与缝合项目中进行了8730次标准化腹腔镜灵巧性训练和2910次体内缝合练习。他们的表现由一名教员监督,该教员在一个为期两天半的项目中记录任务的表现和时间。99名住院医师进行了相同次数的训练和练习,并采用相同的体内缝合技术。为每种训练和缝合练习绘制百分位图,以便比较不同培训组之间的成绩水平。
在绳传练习和缝合练习中,住院医师的表现与经过培训的外科医生相同。与经过培训的外科医生相比,住院医师进行三角转移练习更快,而新杯掉落练习和旧杯掉落练习则更慢。男性和女性住院医师在表现上没有显著差异。
与腹腔镜操作相关的基本技能可以在一个与先前手术经验、性别或年龄无关的简短课程中高水平地获得。